• People

    Advanced Search

  • Services
  • All Services

  • Stark & Stark’s condemnation, redevelopment and eminent domain attorneys represent private property owners, developers, and governmental entities in eminent domain and real estate valuation matters.

    The Condemnation & Eminent Domain Group has substantial experience litigating the government’s right to take private property in both public projects and redevelopment matters, and litigating utility cases including gas pipeline cases. They also have substantial experience in real estate valuation, land use, environmental law, commercial litigation, and prosecuting inverse condemnation claims.

    This multidisciplinary approach allows Stark & Stark condemnation lawyers to serve any additional need that may arise during the property condemnation process. They also work closely with outside professionals such as appraisers, engineers, and planners in order to present compelling expert testimony to the jury or judge.

    Services Our Condemnation and Eminent Domain Attorneys Provide

    Our condemnation and eminent domain attorneys work to protect the interests of their clients located in New Jersey & Pennsylvania, which give us a first-hand understanding of the variations between real estate market values. Our attorneys are experienced in:

    • Pre-condemnation planning
    • Pre-condemnation negotiations with the government
    • Full and partial takings
    • Revocation and modification of highway access
    • NJ Department of Transportation road widening and improvement projects
    • Challenging efforts to designate property in need of redevelopment
    • Redevelopment projects – start to finish
    • Negotiating and litigation gas pipeline easements
    • Valuation of large undeveloped tracts, commercial, and multi-family residential buildings, industrial space, and special use properties
    • Inverse condemnation
    • Relocation benefits

    Inverse Condemnation and Takings

    The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution allows the government to take private property for a public use, providing it pays just compensation. However, sometimes the government takes or damages property without following the proper procedures or paying just compensation. When this happens, a claim of “inverse condemnation” may arise.

    Generally, an inverse condemnation occurs (1) when there is a physical taking such as a land seizure, denial of access, or continued possession after a lease expires, or (2) when the government places a regulation or other restriction on property that unreasonably restricts its use. In the later type of claim, it is important to note that not every type of land use restrictions that decrease the value of land amounts to an inverse condemnation claim. As a result, inverse condemnation claims can be more complicated and require experienced lawyers to evaluate the merits of a claim.

    Stark & Stark’s inverse condemnation attorneys use their extensive experience to defend the rights of landowners, business owners, developers, and property owners. The Inverse Condemnation group has significant success litigating against local, state and federal government entities when there has not been adequate compensation for property that was taken, damaged or devalued. If you have been wrongly deprived of your property rights, our inverse condemnation attorneys can help you get the compensation you deserve.

    Our inverse condemnation attorneys work to protect the rights of our clients in New Jersey and Pennsylvania and advocate on their behalf, with experience in dealing with claims stemming from:

    • Flooding or water diversion
    • Road construction/installation
    • Installation of pipelines or powerlines
    • Regulatory takings

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is eminent domain and who uses it?

    Eminent Domain is the power of the government to take private property and convert it into public use. Government agencies that use eminent domain include state government agencies like the Transportation department and local agencies tied to the municipalities. “The Fifth Amendment provides that the government may only exercise this power if they provide just compensation to the property owners.” This means if the government wants your land for public use it must buy it from you at fair market rates. Usually it tries to buy your property before going through the condemnation process.

    What does “public use” mean? Can eminent domain be used to give my property to a private for-profit company?

    Eminent domain was traditionally used to construct new roads, public buildings, parks, and water/sewer fixtures to improve community services to the general public, i.e., “public use.” As cities matured, the public use definition was broadened to allow cities to rectify “blight” through redevelopment of decaying neighborhoods and revitalization projects for commercial areas. In some states, public use also includes condemnation for “economic development.” This use is the most controversial because it generally involves the transfer of land to private interests. As part of redevelopment plans, Government agencies can use the power of eminent domain to take private property and turn around and transfer the property to a private company. Also, certain private companies have been granted the right to acquire property by eminent domain, including railroads, energy companies and natural resource companies.

    How does the eminent domain process work?

    The government process for using the power of eminent domain varies from state to state. In general it follows a set of steps similar to these:

    1. The government determines there is a need to use eminent domain for a public use purpose, and obtains the necessary approvals from the governing body (usually by the adoption of a resolution or ordinance).
    2. The government negotiates with the property owner to buy the property.
    3. If an agreement can’t be reached with the owner and the property is necessary for the public use project, then the government exercises its power of eminent domain to condemn the property.
    4. If the compensation amount is still in dispute it may go to a panel of condemnation commissioners or court or both.

    Can I stop the government from taking my property?

    The eminent domain process can only be stopped in a limited number of ways:

    1. Public use. The government must support its claim that the “taking” is for a valid public purpose.
    2. The government must also support its claim that the taking of your property is a necessity. If it is taking too much land, it will fail the necessity test—those parcels may then be removed from the condemnation. This also applies to blighted property. If you can prove that your property does not meet a test for blight, you may also be relieved of condemnation.
    3. The government must strictly follow all of the statutory requirements, including negotiating in good faith, accurately describing what property is being taken, and adhering to other procedural protections designed to protect property owners.

    Inability to agree on compensation will not change the eminent domain rulings. Your property will still be condemned and you will be compensated at the fair market value determined by the courts or condemnation commissions.

    Will I be penalized if I choose not to negotiate and force the government to go to court?

    No. As a property owner you have the right to question the government’s purpose and force condemnation.

    What if they take the part of the land I needed or wanted most and it ruins my remaining property?

    Compensation in partial or full takings can be awarded for certain inconveniences and in certain circumstances. For example, compensation may be suitable if:

    1. access is completely blocked or unreasonably limited;
    2. use of your property is less efficient then before the taking, e.g., on a farm; and possibly for
    3. loss of visibility or view but only in the case of a taking.

    You are unlikely to get compensated just because an adjacent property or public use building blocks your view.

    Do I need a lawyer? Can’t I just negotiate with the government on my own?

    You can negotiate on your own, but, depending on your knowledge of eminent domain, you might be better off having an attorney—and getting that attorney at the beginning this complicated process. The government is just a buyer in a real estate transaction–it is trying to get the most value at the lowest price and it has all of the power in the negotiation. Anything you say or information you reveal at the beginning of the process may be used to decrease the value of your property at the end. If you are not aware of all of the compensation options and all of your rights, you could miss out on getting the most money for the property you never intended to sell, or even preventing the condemnation. The government is not obligated to look out for the property owner’s best interest; it only has to make sure you are “fairly” compensated. Keep in mind that fair compensation could be at the bottom of market rates. A lawyer that is experienced in eminent domain can help you get the best price and ensure you are compensated to the full extent of the law and your rights.

    Timothy P. Duggan

    Timothy P. Duggan

    Shareholder
    609.895.7353
    Eric S. Goldberg

    Eric S. Goldberg

    Shareholder
    609.791.7013
    Dolores (Dee) R. Kelley

    Dolores (Dee) R. Kelley

    Shareholder
    609.791.7005
    Joseph R. McCarthy

    Joseph R. McCarthy

    Shareholder
    609.895.7296

    Representative Experience

    *Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances*

    • Stark & Stark stopped the taking of the Henry Farm in Cranbury, New Jersey and permanently protected the farm by having it enter into the New Jersey Farmland Preservation Program.
    • In a condemnation case filed by Middlesex County to take a driveway easement over a warehouse project, Stark & Stark was successful in having the condemnation action dismissed, arguing there was no public benefit supporting the taking.
    • In a condemnation case filed in Morris County New Jersey, Stark & Stark obtained a $441,948 award after a two-day hearing before the Board of Condemnation Commissioners. The New Jersey Department of Transportation initially valued a partial taking of land at $71,000.
    • In a condemnation case filed by a Township in Central New Jersey to acquire a closed golf course for open space, the government offered the property owner $1,340,000 in just compensation. Stark & Stark negotiated a settlement of $4,500,000.
    • In a condemnation case involving a large commercial property in Camden New Jersey being taken by the government for a new County facility, Stark & Stark negotiated a settlement of $10,150,000, representing an increase of $2,335,000 above the government’s appraised value. The case was settled on the eve of trial.
    • In a condemnation case filed  by a New Jersey public university in Camden New Jersey, Stark & Stark obtained a jury verdict in the Superior Court of New Jersey for $4,450,000 for owner of a historic bank building. The public university argued the property was worth $2,375,000.
    • Stark & Stark was counsel for over 45 property owners, governmental entities and non-profit organizations, opposing the PennEast Pipeline in the United States District Court for The District of New Jersey. PennEast proposed to build a natural gas pipeline (about 114 miles) through Pennsylvania and parts of New Jersey.  After years of litigation, PennEast dismissed the condemnation action and the pipeline is not being built.
    • In a condemnation case filed  by a local municipality in New Jersey to take a pier in Monmouth County, Stark & Stark negotiated a final settlement for $2,500,000.  The municipality has appraised the property for $100,000.
    • In a condemnation case filed  by a  local municipality in Burlington County New Jersey for the taking of a small portion of property to build a sidewalk along the Delaware River, Stark & Stark obtained a jury verdict in the Superior Court of New Jersey for $85,250, more than three times of government’s appraised value of $25,000.
    • Stark & Stark successfully defended an appeal for a commercial property owner and obtained a favorable decision for a property owner against a billboard company who was seeking a large portion of the owner’s award of just compensation. The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey found in favor of Stark & Stark’s client and held that a billboard is personal property for purposes of eminent domain.
    • Stark & Stark Represented public entity as special counsel in the acquisition of property abutting Route 22 in Bridgewater New Jersey on a $60 million road project.
    • Stark & Stark represented a public entity in negotiating complex access and takings issues involving railroad rights, railroad crossing agreements and complex title issues.
    • Stark & Stark negotiated design changes to a road widening project involving the New Jersey Turnpike to protect a property owner against flood damage.
    • Stark & Stark negotiated substantial relocation benefits for the relocation of a chemical company in New Brunswick.

    *Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances*

    Business & Commercial Law Blog
    February 26, 2026
    In New Jersey, when two or more people own real property together and one or more no longer want to be a co-owner, they can file a complaint and seek...
    Business & Commercial Law Blog
    February 19, 2026
    I have written and spoken on ways to terminate easements when a property owner finds itself subject to an older easement that is impacting the...
    Business & Commercial Law Blog
    October 9, 2025
    Navigating the pre-foreclosure phase of a commercial property loan requires careful attention to both contractual obligations and statutory...
    Business & Commercial Law Blog
    April 10, 2025
    In a state with as rich a history as New Jersey, new business projects can quickly be sidetracked or delayed by rules meant to encourage historical...
    Business & Commercial Law Blog
    April 3, 2025
    Retail, commercial, and industrial properties are often subject to easements. Situations may arise where a property owner must address an easement....
    Firm News
    February 6, 2026
    We are pleased to share that Tim Duggan of our Condemnation, Redevelopment, and Eminent Domain Group was successful in protecting the owner of a...
    Firm News
    December 8, 2025
    Timothy P. Duggan, Esq. obtained a $441,948 award after a two-day hearing before the Board of Condemnation Commissioners in Morris County, New...
    Firm News
    September 30, 2025
    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Shareholder Timothy Duggan secured a $3,525,000 settlement on behalf of a commercial property owner in...
    Firm News
    April 15, 2020
    Timothy P. Duggan, Chair of Stark & Starks Eminent Domain Group, will be speaking to Engineers and Land Surveyors on April 17, 2020, at a webinar...
    Firm News
    February 11, 2019
    In December, the United States District Court of New Jersey ruled that the PennEast Pipeline Co. LLC was granted access to use eminent domain to...

    Firm Highlights

    Stark & Stark Joins Growing Coalition of Law Firms in Defense of Constitutional Principles and the Independence of the Legal Profession

    Stark & Stark has joined hundreds of fellow law firms across the country in filing an amicus brief supporting Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, Jenner...

    Stark & Stark Attorneys Recognized as New Jersey “Super Lawyers” and “Rising Stars” in 2026

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that 15 of its attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the list of 2026 New Jersey Super Lawyers,...

    Bruce Stern, Esq. Secures $1,000,000 Settlement in Motor Vehicle Collision Case

    Bruce Stern, Esq. recently secured a $1,000,000 settlement in a motor vehicle collision case.* “This case highlights how quickly things can go...

    Deborah Dunn, Esq. Elected to Board of Directors for Angel Flight East

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Deborah Dunn, Esq., Shareholder and Civil Trial Attorney, has been elected to the Board of Directors...

    Michael Jordan, Esq. Joins the Board of the Lawrence Township Community Foundation

    It is our pleasure to announce that Michael Jordan, Esq. has joined the board of the Lawrence Township Community Foundation, an organization...

    Stark & Stark Opens Newtown, Pennsylvania Location

    Stark & Stark announced the relocation of its Yardley, Pennsylvania office to a new location in Newtown, PA. The new office is now open and...

    Joseph Lemkin, Esq. Named to ROI-NJ Influencers: Power List 2026 – Law

    Stark & Stark is proud to share that Joseph Lemkin, Esq., Shareholder, has been named to the 2026 Influencers: Power List in the Law category...

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Michael C. Ksiazek, Esq. Secure $1,000,000 Settlement in Medical Malpractice Wrongful Death Case

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Michael C. Ksiazek, Esq. recently secured a $1,000,000 settlement in a medical malpractice wrongful death...

    Joseph Cullen, Esq. and Nicole Durso, Esq. Secure $2,000,000 Settlement in Personal Injury Matter

    Joseph Cullen, Esq. and Nicole Durso, Esq. recently secured a $2,000,000 settlement in a personal injury matter involving a pedestrian who was struck...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes Susan L. Swatski, Esq. to the Firm

    Continuing in its mission to provide its clients innovative legal solutions to meet their needs, Stark & Stark PC, announced today that Susan L....

    Tim Duggan Wins Eminent Domain Challenge – Case Dismissed

    We are pleased to share that Tim Duggan of our Condemnation, Redevelopment, and Eminent Domain Group was successful in protecting the owner of a...

    James Creegan, Esq. Appointed to Board of The 200 Club of Mercer County

    It is our pleasure to announce that James Creegan, Esq. has been appointed to the Board of Directors of The 200 Club of Mercer County, an...