• People

    Advanced Search

  • Services
  • All Services

  • Seek Justice and Compensation for Your Bard PowerPort Complications Today

    Bard PowerPort medical devices are meant to ease treatment and improve outcomes for patients who require frequent intravenous treatments.

    But for many patients, these devices have caused pain and suffering. Severe complications like infections, blood clots, and migration of device material have all been reported due to the barium sulfate in the catheter.

    If you or your loved ones have suffered due to Bard PowerPort, you deserve justice for the unnecessary risks and pain caused by this defective device.

    If you or a loved one have suffered from Bard PowerPort complications, contact us to schedule a free case evaluation.

    What Is the Bard PowerPort Catheter Lawsuit?

    Join hundreds of others who have stood up against Bard PowerPort’s negligence. Together, we can make a difference.

    In August 2023, these lawsuits were consolidated into federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) No. 3081, which is now being overseen by Judge David G. Campbell in the U.S. District Court for Arizona.

    Taking action in an MDL means your case will be part of a large, coordinated effort. This strategy is intended to hopefully help clients obtain settlements with lower legal costs, and more consistent trial outcomes.

    An MDL allows many cases with similar claims against the same defendant to be handled together. This strategy is similar to a class action lawsuit, but each patient’s case remains individual, recognizing each person’s unique experience.

    As of July 9, 2024, there are 322 cases pending in the Bard PowerPort MDL, with additional cases in the Superior Court of New Jersey.

    Plaintiffs of the Bard implant lawsuit have made these legal claims

     

    Product liability

    Negligence

    Failure to warn

     

    1) Defective Bard PowerPort catheters contain a high concentration of barium sulfate, causing lower material integrity. Resulting fractures or migrations of the catheter have led to significant injuries.

    2) Because of their high failure rate, these devices should not have been marketed as safe.  The manufacturer bears responsibility for this negligence.  

    3) The manufacturer did not effectively and swiftly warn healthcare providers and patients about the device’s risks. As a result, neither providers nor patients were given the information they needed to consider alternatives.

    With extensive experience pursuing MDL and defective device claims, Stark & Stark’s Bard PowerPort defect attorneys are here to help. Reach out today to start the process.

    Bard PowerPort Devices in Lawsuits

    The complaints brought so far involve over a dozen models of the device, including:

    • BardPort M.R.I. Implantable Port
    • BardPort M.R.I. Low-Profile Implantable Port
    • BardPort Titanium Dome Implantable Port
    • BardPort Titanium Implantable Port
    • R.I. Plastic Dual Lumen Port
    • R.I. Ultra SlimPort Implantable Port
    • Peritoneal Titanium Port
    • PowerFlow Implantable Pheresis IV Port
    • PowerPort ClearVUE isp Implantable Port
    • PowerPort ClearVUE Slim Implantable Port
    • PowerPort due M.R.I. Implantable Port
    • PowerPort Implantable Port
    • PowerPort isp Implantable Port
    • PowerPort ism M.R.I. Implantable Port
    • PowerPort M.R.I. Implantable Port
    • PowerPort Slim Implantable Port
    • PowerPort VUE M.R.I. Implantable Port
    • PowerPort VUE Titanium Implantable Port
    • SlimPort Dual-Lumen Rosenblatt Implantable Port
    • Titanium Low-Profile Port
    • Titanium SlimPort Implantable Port
    • Vaccess CT Low-Profile Titanium Power-Injectable Port
    • Vaccess CT Power-Injectable Port
    • X-Port isp M.R.I. Implantable Port
    • X-Port Low-Profile Titanium Port

    You trusted Bard PowerPort for your health. Let us help you hold them accountable for breaking that trust. Contact our experienced MDL legal team for a free case evaluation.

    Who Can File a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit?

    You may be eligible to join the Bard PowerPort litigation if you:

    • Have or have had a Bard PowerPort device implanted
    • Experienced complications
    • Can provide medical records that link your injuries to the defective device

    Family members of deceased patients may also file wrongful death claims if there is proof the device contributed to your loved one’s death.

    Let us help you hold the responsible parties accountable for your injuries. Contact a Stark & Stark Bard PowerPort injury lawyer today for a free case evaluation.

    Injuries from Defective Bard PowerPort Devices

    Patients have a Bard device surgically placed into one of the large central veins that takes blood to the heart. This device allows medicine and fluids to be given and blood samples to be taken directly through the port, reducing the need for multiple needle sticks.

    Under ideal circumstances, this would offer a convenient, less painful option for patients undergoing long-term treatments.

    No one should endure more pain from a device meant to help. Yet, that’s the reality for Bard PowerPort patients who have suffered complications, injuries, and ultimately more medical costs after installation.

    Types of injuries patients have suffered:

    • Infections, septic shock
    • Bleeding
    • Deep vein and arterial thrombosis (blood clots)
    • Cardiac arrhythmia
    • Cardiac tamponade
    • Perforation of blood vessels, tissue, and organs
    • Severe, persistent pain
    • Necrosis at the port site
    • Death

    These serious injuries often result from the Bard PowerPort’s faulty design. In some cases, particles from the catheter have broken free (fractured) and moved through the body. Others are due to the device’s migration (movement) within the body.

    Discuss your injuries and find out if you qualify for compensation. Schedule a free case evaluation with one of Stark & Stark’s knowledgeable defective device attorneys.

    How to File a Bard PowerPort Catheter Lawsuit

    The first step to filing a lawsuit is to collect any information that might be relevant. In this case, potential claimants should gather as many of the following as possible:

    • Date of Bard PowerPort implantation
    • Medical records related to the implantation
    • Details of complications experienced
    • Dates and descriptions of follow-up treatments
    • Names of healthcare providers involved
    • Any communication with the device manufacturer
    • Insurance information
    • Employment records (if work was affected)

    The next step is to contact an experienced Bard PowerPort defect attorney. They can help you understand your options for pursuing compensation for your pain and suffering.

    Get Help from Our Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Lawyers

    You shouldn’t have to face this alone. We’re here to provide the compassionate, one-on-one support you need.

    At Stark & Stark, we have deep knowledge of the ins and outs of product liability and medical device defect cases needed to pursue Bard Powerport injury claims effectively. We’ll ensure your case is thoroughly investigated and, if eligible to file, represented robustly for the best chance at compensation.

    Take the first step toward filing your Bard catheter lawsuit now and hold those responsible accountable.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What do I do if I suspect my medical device is defective?

    Seek medical attention immediately, document your symptoms and medical treatments, and consult an attorney to discuss your options.

    How much money could I receive in a Bard PowerPort settlement?

    This is something that will depend on injury severity, s0 speaking with an attorney to better understand your case is always the best course of action.

    How long do patients have to file PowerPort injury claims?

    It’s crucial to contact an attorney promptly because statutes of limitations may apply. Delaying action could result in losing your right to seek compensation.

    Is there a Bard PowerPort recall?

    No. The manufacturer has not issued a recent voluntary recall related to the lawsuit, and the FDA has not required one at this time.

    Speak with an Experienced Attorney Today

    Key Contacts

    Martin P. Schrama
    609.895.7261

    Firm Highlights

    Stark & Stark Shareholder Deborah S. Dunn, Esq. Installed as 2nd Vice President and Diversity Officer of the New Jersey Association for Justice for 2026–2027

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Shareholder Deborah S. Dunn, Esq. has been installed as 2nd Vice President and Diversity Officer of the...

    Stark & Stark Recognized with Community Partner Award by Mercer County Community College Foundation

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that the firm has been recognized with the Community Partner Award by the Mercer County Community College...

    Carin A. O’Donnell, Esq. Inducted as 2026-2027 President of the Pennsylvania Association for Justice

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Carin A. O'Donnell, Esq. was sworn in as the 2026-2027 President of the Pennsylvania Association for...

    Stark & Stark’s Thomas S. Onder, Esq. Receives 2026 ICSC Trustees’ Distinguished Service Award

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Thomas S. Onder, Esq., Shareholder and Chair of the Firm’s Shopping Center & Retail Development...

    Stark & Stark’s Joseph H. Lemkin Esq., Named 2026 Professional Lawyer of the Year for the Jewish Bar Association of New Jersey

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Joseph H. Lemkin Esq. has been selected by the New Jersey Commission on Professionalism in the Law as...

    Our Values Remain: A Message on the Closing of Diversity Lab

    Stark & Stark is saddened and disappointed to learn that Diversity Lab, the organization that created and manages the Mansfield Certification...

    Congratulations to Shareholder Bhaveen R. Jani, Esq. on his Installation as Treasurer of the Middlesex County Bar Foundation

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Shareholder Bhaveen R. Jani, Esq. has been installed as Treasurer of the Middlesex County Bar Foundation,...

    Denise Mariani, Esq., and Jonathan Lauri, Esq. Secure $750,000 Jury Verdict Against Hamilton Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

    It is our pleasure to announce that Denise Mariani, Esq., and Jonathan Lauri, Esq., secured a $750,000 jury verdict on behalf of a nursing home...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes 2026 Summer Law Clerks

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce its 10th Annual Summer Law Clerk Program. Five Summer Law Clerks will join the firm from June through July...

    Retail Development Team Secures Major Recovery for Landlord Client Amid Bankruptcy Dispute

    Our Shopping Center and Retail Development Group recently secured a multi-million-dollar settlement for a commercial landlord client' s property...

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Catherine Foley, Esq. Secure $950,000 Settlement in Surgical Malpractice Matter

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Catherine Foley, Esq. recently secured a confidential $950,000 settlement in a surgical malpractice case. “This...

    Victoria Wilton, Esq. Selected to Serve on New Jersey State Bar Association Family Law Executive Committee

    We are proud to announce that Victoria Wilton, Esq. has been selected to serve on the New Jersey State Bar Association Family Law Executive Committee...