• People

    Advanced Search

  • Services
  • All Services

  • Back to News & Media
    Blog

    What Income is Used to Determine Alimony & Child Support in New Jersey?

    February 5, 2019

     Download as PDF

    The fairness of the calculation of alimony and child support depends on the accuracy of both party’s respective incomes. Both alimony and child support are calculated using each party’s gross income.

    Gross income may include income from the following sources:

    • compensation for services, including: wages, fees, tips, and commissions;
    • the operation of a business minus ordinary and necessary operating expenses;
    • gains derived from dealings in property;
    • interest and dividends;
    • rents (minus ordinary and necessary expenses);
    • bonuses and royalties;
    • alimony and separate maintenance payments received from the current or past relationships;
    • annuities or an interest in a trust;
    • life insurance and endowment contracts;
    • distributions from government and private retirement plans including Social Security, Veteran’s Administration, Railroad Retirement Board, deferred compensation, Keoughs and IRA’s;
    • personal injury awards or other civil lawsuits;
    • interest in a decedent’s estate or a trust;
    • disability grants or payments (including Social Security disability);
    • profit sharing plans;
    • worker’s compensation;
    • unemployment compensation benefits;
    • overtime, part-time and severance pay;
    • net gambling winnings;
    • the sale of investments (net capital gain) or earnings from investments;
    • income tax credits or rebates (excluding the federal and state Earned Income Credit and the N.J. homestead rebate);
    • unreported cash payments (if identifiable);
    • the value of in-kind benefits; and
    • imputed income.

    Since both parties gross incomes are used to calculate alimony and child support, the first thing an attorney will do is determine what income to use for each party in the calculations. In some cases, the parties gross incomes can be easily determined, such as where both parties earn predictable salaries as W-2 wage earners.

    However, the appropriate income to use for either or both parties may also be more complicated, especially when one spouse does not earn an income or in cases that involve incomes that fluctuate from year to year, which usually involve business owners or when one party receives either discretionary bonuses or fluctuating commissions.

    In cases where a Court finds that either party is voluntarily unemployed or underemployed, the Court will usually impute income to that party based on their work history, earning capacity, educational background, etc. A Court may look to that party’s previous income, the average earnings for that occupation as reported by the New Jersey Department of Labor, or based on full-time employment at forty (40) hours per week at the New Jersey minimum wage.

    In cases where a party’s income fluctuates from year to year, our Courts will generally include all sources of income for each party, including bonuses and commissions, and average that party’s income over a period of three (3) to five (5) years to determine the income for that party for purposes of calculating alimony and child support.

    Although our Courts will usually average a party’s income if one or both parties income fluctuates, attorneys have the ability to be creative where our Courts do not. Typically, the payor spouse objects to calculating child support and/or alimony utilizing an income averaging approach, since their support obligations will be based on incomes, which may include discretionary bonuses or unpredictable commissions that they may not receive.

    One common way attorneys are able to resolve a situation where one party’s income fluctuates is to negotiate a base child support or alimony figure on each party’s base salaries alone. Additionally, there is an additional Supplemental child support and/or alimony figure, which is usually a percentage of the payors bonus/commissions.

    In any event, if you anticipate a divorce and will need either child support or alimony calculated, it is imperative that you consult with an experienced family law attorney.

    Firm Highlights

    Stark & Stark Joins Growing Coalition of Law Firms in Defense of Constitutional Principles and the Independence of the Legal Profession

    Stark & Stark has joined hundreds of fellow law firms across the country in filing an amicus brief supporting Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, Jenner...

    Stark & Stark Attorneys Recognized as New Jersey “Super Lawyers” and “Rising Stars” in 2026

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that 15 of its attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the list of 2026 New Jersey Super Lawyers,...

    Bruce Stern, Esq. Secures $1,000,000 Settlement in Motor Vehicle Collision Case

    Bruce Stern, Esq. recently secured a $1,000,000 settlement in a motor vehicle collision case.* “This case highlights how quickly things can go...

    Deborah Dunn, Esq. Elected to Board of Directors for Angel Flight East

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Deborah Dunn, Esq., Shareholder and Civil Trial Attorney, has been elected to the Board of Directors...

    Michael Jordan, Esq. Joins the Board of the Lawrence Township Community Foundation

    It is our pleasure to announce that Michael Jordan, Esq. has joined the board of the Lawrence Township Community Foundation, an organization...

    Stark & Stark Opens Newtown, Pennsylvania Location

    Stark & Stark announced the relocation of its Yardley, Pennsylvania office to a new location in Newtown, PA. The new office is now open and...

    Joseph Lemkin, Esq. Named to ROI-NJ Influencers: Power List 2026 – Law

    Stark & Stark is proud to share that Joseph Lemkin, Esq., Shareholder, has been named to the 2026 Influencers: Power List in the Law category...

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Michael C. Ksiazek, Esq. Secure $1,000,000 Settlement in Medical Malpractice Wrongful Death Case

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Michael C. Ksiazek, Esq. recently secured a $1,000,000 settlement in a medical malpractice wrongful death...

    Joseph Cullen, Esq. and Nicole Durso, Esq. Secure $2,000,000 Settlement in Personal Injury Matter

    Joseph Cullen, Esq. and Nicole Durso, Esq. recently secured a $2,000,000 settlement in a personal injury matter involving a pedestrian who was struck...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes Susan L. Swatski, Esq. to the Firm

    Continuing in its mission to provide its clients innovative legal solutions to meet their needs, Stark & Stark PC, announced today that Susan L....

    Tim Duggan Wins Eminent Domain Challenge – Case Dismissed

    We are pleased to share that Tim Duggan of our Condemnation, Redevelopment, and Eminent Domain Group was successful in protecting the owner of a...

    James Creegan, Esq. Appointed to Board of The 200 Club of Mercer County

    It is our pleasure to announce that James Creegan, Esq. has been appointed to the Board of Directors of The 200 Club of Mercer County, an...