
When a commercial tenant files for bankruptcy, they have the option to assume or reject unexpired leases. A bankruptcy lease rejection is a significant action, as it communicates the debtor’s intent to hand back the space.
In today’s real estate market, tight supply for space has many commercial landlords eager to get their premises back so they can charge higher market rents. But, before you take those keys back, here are five issues to keep in mind:
Although rejection of a commercial lease is effective only upon court approval, courts have the equitable power to order a rejection to operate retroactively, often to the bankruptcy petition filing date. This means that the effective date of rejection can be set earlier than the date on which the landlord retakes possession of the premises.
Early in the bankruptcy case, a debtor may file a motion to reject the lease as of the petition date. However, if the debtor was operating the premises between the petition date and when the motion is heard, you may have a good argument to oppose setting the rejection on the petition filing date. If successful, you could receive rent for this period and seek to be paid ahead of other creditors as an administrative claim.
Bankruptcy Code Sections 502 and 365 provide the various claims that landlords have in a tenant bankruptcy, including:
Since the rejection of a lease does not terminate the lease, but rather constitutes a breach of the lease, the landlord can file a claim for damages resulting from the rejection.
However, there is a cap on the landlord’s claim for lost rental income damages under the Bankruptcy Code. This cap is designed to balance the interests of the landlord and the bankruptcy estate, limiting the landlord’s claim to a reasonable amount while allowing the estate to reorganize or liquidate without being unduly burdened by excessive claims.
Under section 502(b)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code, landlord rejection claims are capped at the rental amount for the greater of:
It is important to understand these landlord claims and ensure that they are filed on time in the bankruptcy court. Often, the debtor will place a 30-day time period to file rejection claims from the rejection date. Although creditors have the ability to amend their claims, the Bankruptcy Court is very strict about adhering to the claim deadlines.
Issues can arise whether a claim is an administrative claim or a rejection claim. If it is an administrative claim, the claim has higher payment priority – meaning you may actually get paid your full claim, as opposed to a pro rata distribution.
Often a landlord will assert that damages arose while the tenant was in possession and that repairs should have been handled during this pre-rejection period. Debtors may assert that the damages occurred after the rejection date. To ensure that your claim is accurate, it is advisable to request an inspection of the premises prior to any lease rejection in bankruptcy. Reports, photos and eyewitness accounts can greatly assist with ensuring the proper priority of your claim.
When a debtor rejects a lease they may request a bit of time to conduct going out of business sales. Often you can reach out to the debtor to negotiate terms of the going out of business sales – how often sign-walkers will publicize the sales, what is secured to the building, placement of sale ads, etc. All of these items can affect your claims before and during the rejection period.
Experienced and effective legal counsel can assist to allow you access to inspect your space, ensure that signs are not “hammered” into your building causing damage, and explain how your claims will be treated.
Once the leased space is rejected, it is imperative to act quickly to secure your property to protect your interest. Reaching out to the debtor to gain HVAC and security codes prior to turnover, as well as keys can save you time and money.
Rejection of a commercial lease in bankruptcy involves a careful balancing of interests, with specific provisions in place to protect both the landlord’s rights and the debtor’s ability to manage their bankruptcy estate effectively. Thinking about these five issues before a bankruptcy filing can ensure that you are managing your property as best as possible.
If you are a landlord or trade creditor in a retail bankruptcy it is vital to know your rights now. Stark & Stark’s Shopping Center and Retail Development Group can help. Our bankruptcy attorneys regularly represent landlords throughout the country, including recently in the Eastern District of Missouri, District of New Jersey, Southern District of New York, District of Delaware, District of Minnesota and the Western and Eastern Districts of Pennsylvania regarding a variety of issues.
Most recently, our Group has represented landlords and trade creditors in Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases involving Party City, Big Lots, Tijuana Flats, Rite Aid, Blink Fitness, Express, JOANN’s and Sports Authority.
For more information on how Stark & Stark can assist you, please contact Shareholder Thomas Onder at (609) 219-7458 (tonder@stark-stark.com).
Stark & Stark Attorneys Recognized as New Jersey “Super Lawyers” and “Rising Stars” in 2026
Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that 15 of its attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the list of 2026 New Jersey Super Lawyers,...Bruce Stern, Esq. Secures $1,000,000 Settlement in Motor Vehicle Collision Case
Bruce Stern, Esq. recently secured a $1,000,000 settlement in a motor vehicle collision case.* “This case highlights how quickly things can go...Deborah Dunn, Esq. Elected to Board of Directors for Angel Flight East
Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Deborah Dunn, Esq., Shareholder and Civil Trial Attorney, has been elected to the Board of Directors...Michael Jordan, Esq. Joins the Board of the Lawrence Township Community Foundation
It is our pleasure to announce that Michael Jordan, Esq. has joined the board of the Lawrence Township Community Foundation, an organization...Joseph Lemkin, Esq. Named to ROI-NJ Influencers: Power List 2026 – Law
Stark & Stark is proud to share that Joseph Lemkin, Esq., Shareholder, has been named to the 2026 Influencers: Power List in the Law category...Joseph Cullen, Esq. and Nicole Durso, Esq. Secure $2,000,000 Settlement in Personal Injury Matter
Joseph Cullen, Esq. and Nicole Durso, Esq. recently secured a $2,000,000 settlement in a personal injury matter involving a pedestrian who was struck...James Creegan, Esq. Appointed to Board of The 200 Club of Mercer County
It is our pleasure to announce that James Creegan, Esq. has been appointed to the Board of Directors of The 200 Club of Mercer County, an...