• People

    Advanced Search

  • Services
  • All Services

  • NJ Alimony Lawyer

    What is Alimony?

    Alimony is financial support paid by one spouse to the other. Alimony is in addition to child support and is not related to the child’s emancipation. It is support paid by one spouse to the other solely for the support of the recipient spouse regardless of the needs or status of the children.

    There are very important differences between alimony payments and child support not only in terms of a person’s initial entitlement, but with regard to the duration, the ability to modify the amount and the termination of the payments. However, one of the most important distinctions is that child support is not tax deductible by the person making the payments nor is it considered taxable income to the person who is receiving the payments. Alimony, on the other hand, is tax deductible to the payor and is considered taxable income to the recipient. Consult with an experienced Stark & Stark  New Jersey Alimony lawyer to learn more.

    There are several types of alimony in New Jersey:

    • Rehabilitative Alimony is designed to enable the recipient to “rehabilitate” their career. If, for example, one of the spouses has interrupted their career to be a stay at home parent and now needs additional education, recertification or licensing in order to return to their employment, rehabilitative alimony may be appropriate to sustain their living expenses or to cover their educational expenses until they are able to return to their prior career.
    • Reimbursement Alimony is seldom used but is designed to reimburse one of the spouses for their “investment” in the other spouse’s career or earning capacity. It is designed to address the situation in which one of the spouses contributed to the college or graduate school expenses of the other and the marriage terminates before the financial benefits of the enhanced education can be realized. The intent is to repay the person for their contributions to the other party’s education or career training.
    • Limited Duration Alimony is paid for a defined period of time. In order to award Limited Duration Alimony, the Court must make a finding that Open Durational Alimony is not warranted because of the length of the marriage, the parties’ incomes or other factors. After reaching the conclusion that Open Durational Alimony is not warranted, the Court may then award Limited Duration Alimony in a specific amount for a designated length of time. Once awarded, the length of the term itself may not be extended although the amount may be modified.
    • Open Durational Alimony has on open term until either the Court terminates payment or the parties agree to terminate payments. “Open Durational” replaced “Permanent Alimony” which semantically differed by listing the term of payment “until death of either party.” Under Open Durational Alimony, there is a “presumption” that the alimony will terminate when the payer spouse reaches the Social Security retirement age. If the payee can rebut that argument to support ongoing payments, the court may continue alimony for an additional period of time. Open durational Alimony usually applies to marriages over twenty (20) years in length and is subject to termination based on a substantial change in circumstances.

    A “substantial change of circumstances” may include a significant increase in a party’s income, a significant decrease in a party’s income, a medical condition, a termination of employment or retirement.

    In determining both the type and amount of alimony, the court must consider specific factors including:

    • The needs of the recipient and/or payer;
    • The ability of the payer to make the payments;
    • The duration of the marriage;
    • The parties’ age;
    • The parties’ physical and emotional health;
    • The standard of living established during the marriage;
    • The earning capacity, the educational levels and employability of each of the parties;
    • The length of absence from the job market of the recipient party;
    • Each party’s parental responsibilities for the unemancipated children;
    • The time and expense necessary to acquire sufficient training or education in order to return to the employment market;
    • The history of financial or non-financial contributions to the marriage by each party;
    • The amount of equitable distribution by either party and, specifically, the income which such equitable distribution may generate to each of the parties;
    • An unearned or investment income;
    • The tax consequences of the alimony.

    It is often said that both the recipient and the payer of the alimony should be able to enjoy the “standard of living which was established and maintained during the marriage.”

    However, that concept is much more of a guidepost than an attainable reality in most cases. In all but an extraordinarily high income family, it is simply impossible for both parties to maintain the same standard of living that was enjoyed by them during the marriage. In the vast majority of cases, both parties will have to compromise their marital lifestyle. It is simply arithmetically impossible to divide the post-divorce income into two family units and have each of the units equal the prior single family unit lifestyle.

    There are very important principles of law which address the situation in which a payer’s income increases after the divorce. The application of those principles requires an in depth review by a competent Divorce Attorney. However, the general concept is that the recipient of alimony is only entitled to enjoy the lifestyle and thus receive alimony based upon the payer’s income during the marriage and at the time of the divorce. They are not entitled to share in income increases which occur after the dissolution of the marital partnership and without contribution or support from the recipient spouse.

    On the other hand, if the parties’ financial circumstances at the time of the divorce do not enable the recipient spouse to be supported at the standard of living which was enjoyed during the marriage, and the payer’s post-divorce income rises to a level that then enables a payment which would maintain the marital standard, a post-divorce increase in the amount of alimony may be warranted.

    How About Retirement and Alimony in New Jersey?

    In New Jersey, an alimony obligation is modifiable based upon a showing that a substantial change in circumstances has occurred since the time of the divorce. Examples of a “change in circumstance” that may warrant a modification of an alimony obligation include an increase or an involuntary decrease in either party’s income/finances, cohabitation of the alimony recipient tantamount to remarriage, involuntary loss of employment, and good faith retirement of the payor.

    The termination of the payor’s alimony obligation occasioned upon a payor’s retirement is not automatic. It is up to the payor to file an application with the Court to modify and/or terminate their alimony obligation due to their retirement. In determining whether a payor’s impending retirement constitutes a substantial change in circumstances warranting a modification and/or termination, the Court will consider (1) the age and health of the parties seeking to retire, and (2) the motive and timing of the impending retirement. The Court will also look at the payor’s ability to pay alimony after retirement, as well as the recipient spouse’s ability to provide for themselves. This involves an examination of both parties’ incomes and assets.

    In the event the Court determines that the reason for retirement is to avoid their alimony obligation, the payor’s application will be denied. In the event that the Court finds that the payor’s retirement is in good faith, the Court must then determine whether the advantage of the retirement to the retiring spouse outweighs the disadvantage to the recipient. This determination is critical to the analysis. In the event that the Court determines that the advantage to the payor in retiring does not “substantially outweigh” the disadvantage to the recipient, then the payor’s retirement, even though pursued in good faith, will not be a basis to modify their alimony obligation. This is a fact sensitive inquiry that the Court determines on a case-by-case basis.

    Contact an experienced NJ alimony attorney today at 800-535-3425 or leave us a message.

    Speak with an Experienced Attorney Today

    "*" indicates required fields

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

    Key Contact

    Louis M. Ragone
    609.219.7448

    Firm Highlights

    Stark & Stark Shareholder Deborah S. Dunn, Esq. Installed as 2nd Vice President and Diversity Officer of the New Jersey Association for Justice for 2026–2027

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Shareholder Deborah S. Dunn, Esq. has been installed as 2nd Vice President and Diversity Officer of the...

    Stark & Stark Recognized with Community Partner Award by Mercer County Community College Foundation

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that the firm has been recognized with the Community Partner Award by the Mercer County Community College...

    Carin A. O’Donnell, Esq. Inducted as 2026-2027 President of the Pennsylvania Association for Justice

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Carin A. O'Donnell, Esq. was sworn in as the 2026-2027 President of the Pennsylvania Association for...

    Stark & Stark’s Thomas S. Onder, Esq. Receives 2026 ICSC Trustees’ Distinguished Service Award

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Thomas S. Onder, Esq., Shareholder and Chair of the Firm’s Shopping Center & Retail Development...

    Stark & Stark’s Joseph H. Lemkin Esq., Named 2026 Professional Lawyer of the Year for the Jewish Bar Association of New Jersey

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Joseph H. Lemkin Esq. has been selected by the New Jersey Commission on Professionalism in the Law as...

    Our Values Remain: A Message on the Closing of Diversity Lab

    Stark & Stark is saddened and disappointed to learn that Diversity Lab, the organization that created and manages the Mansfield Certification...

    Congratulations to Shareholder Bhaveen R. Jani, Esq. on his Installation as Treasurer of the Middlesex County Bar Foundation

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Shareholder Bhaveen R. Jani, Esq. has been installed as Treasurer of the Middlesex County Bar Foundation,...

    Denise Mariani, Esq., and Jonathan Lauri, Esq. Secure $750,000 Jury Verdict Against Hamilton Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

    It is our pleasure to announce that Denise Mariani, Esq., and Jonathan Lauri, Esq., secured a $750,000 jury verdict on behalf of a nursing home...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes 2026 Summer Law Clerks

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce its 10th Annual Summer Law Clerk Program. Five Summer Law Clerks will join the firm from June through July...

    Retail Development Team Secures Major Recovery for Landlord Client Amid Bankruptcy Dispute

    Our Shopping Center and Retail Development Group recently secured a multi-million-dollar settlement for a commercial landlord client' s property...

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Catherine Foley, Esq. Secure $950,000 Settlement in Surgical Malpractice Matter

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Catherine Foley, Esq. recently secured a confidential $950,000 settlement in a surgical malpractice case. “This...

    Victoria Wilton, Esq. Selected to Serve on New Jersey State Bar Association Family Law Executive Committee

    We are proud to announce that Victoria Wilton, Esq. has been selected to serve on the New Jersey State Bar Association Family Law Executive Committee...