• People

    Advanced Search

  • Services
  • All Services

  • NJ Alimony Lawyer

    What is Alimony?

    Alimony is financial support paid by one spouse to the other. Alimony is in addition to child support and is not related to the child’s emancipation. It is support paid by one spouse to the other solely for the support of the recipient spouse regardless of the needs or status of the children.

    There are very important differences between alimony payments and child support not only in terms of a person’s initial entitlement, but with regard to the duration, the ability to modify the amount and the termination of the payments. However, one of the most important distinctions is that child support is not tax deductible by the person making the payments nor is it considered taxable income to the person who is receiving the payments. Alimony, on the other hand, is tax deductible to the payor and is considered taxable income to the recipient. Consult with an experienced Stark & Stark  New Jersey Alimony lawyer to learn more.

    There are several types of alimony in New Jersey:

    • Rehabilitative Alimony is designed to enable the recipient to “rehabilitate” their career. If, for example, one of the spouses has interrupted their career to be a stay at home parent and now needs additional education, recertification or licensing in order to return to their employment, rehabilitative alimony may be appropriate to sustain their living expenses or to cover their educational expenses until they are able to return to their prior career.
    • Reimbursement Alimony is seldom used but is designed to reimburse one of the spouses for their “investment” in the other spouse’s career or earning capacity. It is designed to address the situation in which one of the spouses contributed to the college or graduate school expenses of the other and the marriage terminates before the financial benefits of the enhanced education can be realized. The intent is to repay the person for their contributions to the other party’s education or career training.
    • Limited Duration Alimony is paid for a defined period of time. In order to award Limited Duration Alimony, the Court must make a finding that Open Durational Alimony is not warranted because of the length of the marriage, the parties’ incomes or other factors. After reaching the conclusion that Open Durational Alimony is not warranted, the Court may then award Limited Duration Alimony in a specific amount for a designated length of time. Once awarded, the length of the term itself may not be extended although the amount may be modified.
    • Open Durational Alimony has on open term until either the Court terminates payment or the parties agree to terminate payments. “Open Durational” replaced “Permanent Alimony” which semantically differed by listing the term of payment “until death of either party.” Under Open Durational Alimony, there is a “presumption” that the alimony will terminate when the payer spouse reaches the Social Security retirement age. If the payee can rebut that argument to support ongoing payments, the court may continue alimony for an additional period of time. Open durational Alimony usually applies to marriages over twenty (20) years in length and is subject to termination based on a substantial change in circumstances.

    A “substantial change of circumstances” may include a significant increase in a party’s income, a significant decrease in a party’s income, a medical condition, a termination of employment or retirement.

    In determining both the type and amount of alimony, the court must consider specific factors including:

    • The needs of the recipient and/or payer;
    • The ability of the payer to make the payments;
    • The duration of the marriage;
    • The parties’ age;
    • The parties’ physical and emotional health;
    • The standard of living established during the marriage;
    • The earning capacity, the educational levels and employability of each of the parties;
    • The length of absence from the job market of the recipient party;
    • Each party’s parental responsibilities for the unemancipated children;
    • The time and expense necessary to acquire sufficient training or education in order to return to the employment market;
    • The history of financial or non-financial contributions to the marriage by each party;
    • The amount of equitable distribution by either party and, specifically, the income which such equitable distribution may generate to each of the parties;
    • An unearned or investment income;
    • The tax consequences of the alimony.

    It is often said that both the recipient and the payer of the alimony should be able to enjoy the “standard of living which was established and maintained during the marriage.”

    However, that concept is much more of a guidepost than an attainable reality in most cases. In all but an extraordinarily high income family, it is simply impossible for both parties to maintain the same standard of living that was enjoyed by them during the marriage. In the vast majority of cases, both parties will have to compromise their marital lifestyle. It is simply arithmetically impossible to divide the post-divorce income into two family units and have each of the units equal the prior single family unit lifestyle.

    There are very important principles of law which address the situation in which a payer’s income increases after the divorce. The application of those principles requires an in depth review by a competent Divorce Attorney. However, the general concept is that the recipient of alimony is only entitled to enjoy the lifestyle and thus receive alimony based upon the payer’s income during the marriage and at the time of the divorce. They are not entitled to share in income increases which occur after the dissolution of the marital partnership and without contribution or support from the recipient spouse.

    On the other hand, if the parties’ financial circumstances at the time of the divorce do not enable the recipient spouse to be supported at the standard of living which was enjoyed during the marriage, and the payer’s post-divorce income rises to a level that then enables a payment which would maintain the marital standard, a post-divorce increase in the amount of alimony may be warranted.

    How About Retirement and Alimony in New Jersey?

    In New Jersey, an alimony obligation is modifiable based upon a showing that a substantial change in circumstances has occurred since the time of the divorce. Examples of a “change in circumstance” that may warrant a modification of an alimony obligation include an increase or an involuntary decrease in either party’s income/finances, cohabitation of the alimony recipient tantamount to remarriage, involuntary loss of employment, and good faith retirement of the payor.

    The termination of the payor’s alimony obligation occasioned upon a payor’s retirement is not automatic. It is up to the payor to file an application with the Court to modify and/or terminate their alimony obligation due to their retirement. In determining whether a payor’s impending retirement constitutes a substantial change in circumstances warranting a modification and/or termination, the Court will consider (1) the age and health of the parties seeking to retire, and (2) the motive and timing of the impending retirement. The Court will also look at the payor’s ability to pay alimony after retirement, as well as the recipient spouse’s ability to provide for themselves. This involves an examination of both parties’ incomes and assets.

    In the event the Court determines that the reason for retirement is to avoid their alimony obligation, the payor’s application will be denied. In the event that the Court finds that the payor’s retirement is in good faith, the Court must then determine whether the advantage of the retirement to the retiring spouse outweighs the disadvantage to the recipient. This determination is critical to the analysis. In the event that the Court determines that the advantage to the payor in retiring does not “substantially outweigh” the disadvantage to the recipient, then the payor’s retirement, even though pursued in good faith, will not be a basis to modify their alimony obligation. This is a fact sensitive inquiry that the Court determines on a case-by-case basis.

    Contact an experienced NJ alimony attorney today at 800-535-3425 or leave us a message.

    Speak with an Experienced Attorney Today

    "*" indicates required fields

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

    Key Contact

    Louis M. Ragone
    609.219.7448

    Firm Highlights

    Bruce H. Stern, Esq. Secures $5.5 Million Settlement for Traumatic Brain Injury Victim

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Shareholder Bruce H. Stern, Esq., Certified Civil Trial Attorney and member of the firm’s Accident...

    “Best Law Firms” 2027 List Issued by Best Lawyers Recognizes Stark & Stark PC

    We are proud to announce that the firm has been included in the 2027 Edition of Best Lawyers “Best Law Firms®” list, earning 11 regional...

    Bruce H. Stern, Esq. Secures $950,000 Settlement for Traumatic Brain Injury Client

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Shareholder Bruce H. Stern, Esq., Certified Civil Trial Attorney and member of the firm's Accident...

    Evan J. Lide, Esq. Secures $2.15 Million Wrongful Death Settlement

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Shareholder Evan J. Lide, Esq. recently secured a $2,150,000 settlement on behalf of the family of a...

    Evan J. Lide, Esq. and J. Robert Bratman, Esq. Secure $1,250,000 Settlement for Injured Bicyclist Hit by Commercial Vehicle

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Shareholders Evan J. Lide, Esq. and J. Robert Bratman, Esq., both Certified Civil Trial Attorneys and...

    Stark & Stark Attorneys Recognized as New Jersey “Super Lawyers” and “Rising Stars” in 2027

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that 16 of its attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the list of 2027 New Jersey Super Lawyers,...

    8 Ways to Support a Loved One Living With Dementia

    If someone you love is living with Alzheimer's or another form of dementia, you already know how much the small moments matter. How you greet them,...

    Stark & Stark’s Chinsu Shajan, Esq. Receives Mercer County Bar Association Rising Leader Award

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Chinsu Shajan, Esq., a Shareholder in the Firm’s Accident & Personal Injury Group, was honored by...

    Michael H. Foster, Esq. and Stephen M. Di Stefano, Esq. Secure $5.5 Million Settlement for Victim of Motor Vehicle Crash

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Michael H. Foster, Esq. and Stephen M. Di Stefano, Esq., both Certified Civil Trial Attorneys and...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes Nicholas Giaquinto

    Stark & Stark is pleased to welcome Nicholas Giaquinto as a Law Clerk in the firm’s Banking & Financial Services Group and Commercial...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes New Associate Michael Diaz, Esq.

    Stark & Stark is pleased to welcome Michael Diaz, Esq. as a new Associate in the firm's Accident & Personal Injury Group.  Before joining...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes New Associate Alex Miller, Esq.

    Stark & Stark is pleased to welcome Alex Miller, Esq. as a new Associate in the firm's Accident & Personal Injury Group, where he will...