• People

    Advanced Search

  • Services
  • All Services

  • If an alimony recipient lives with an unrelated person, the cohabitation may justify a modification or termination of an alimony obligation. The Courts look at two things:

    1. Is there “cohabitation” by the alimony recipient? If yes, the dependent spouse will have the burden to prove a continued financial need based on his or her individual economic circumstances in order to preserve alimony payments.
    2. What is the economic effect of his or her cohabitation and does it warrant termination or modification of the supporting spouse’s payment of alimony? Assessment of financial need rests on whether there is a decrease in need (a) because he or she is receiving support from the person with whom he or she is cohabiting, or (b) due to the probability that the alimony is being used to support the person with whom he or she is cohabiting. Because this is generally only known by the dependent, the burden to prove continued financial need falls on the recipient of the alimony. If he or she does not come forward, the payer should be entitled to terminate his or her alimony obligation.

    In many cases, the effect of cohabitation on the alimony obligation will be specifically addressed in a Marital Settlement or Property Settlement Agreement. In cases where neither Agreement specifically addresses the issue of cohabitation, the Courts have held that state case law applies. In these cases, the Court must analyze seven factors to assess the nature of the relationship and determine whether alimony should be suspended or terminated as a result of the cohabitation:

    1. Intertwined finances such as joint bank accounts and other joint holdings or liabilities;
    2. Shared or joint responsibility for living expenses;
    3. Recognition of the relationship in the couple’s social family circle;
    4. Shared premise, frequency of contact, duration of the relationship, and other indicia of a mutually supportive intimate personal relationship;
    5. Shared household chores;
    6. Whether the recipient of alimony has received an enforceable promise of support from another person; and,
    7. All other relevant evidence.

    The Courts use the length of the relationship as a deciding factor to determine whether a suspension or modification of an alimony obligation is appropriate. The longer the cohabitation, the more likely a change in alimony is warranted.

    Contact a New Jersey Cohabitation Lawyer or Leave Us a Message

    Firm Highlights

    Stark & Stark Shareholder Deborah S. Dunn, Esq. Installed as 2nd Vice President and Diversity Officer of the New Jersey Association for Justice for 2026–2027

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Shareholder Deborah S. Dunn, Esq. has been installed as 2nd Vice President and Diversity Officer of the...

    Stark & Stark Recognized with Community Partner Award by Mercer County Community College Foundation

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that the firm has been recognized with the Community Partner Award by the Mercer County Community College...

    Carin A. O’Donnell, Esq. Inducted as 2026-2027 President of the Pennsylvania Association for Justice

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Carin A. O'Donnell, Esq. was sworn in as the 2026-2027 President of the Pennsylvania Association for...

    Stark & Stark’s Thomas S. Onder, Esq. Receives 2026 ICSC Trustees’ Distinguished Service Award

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Thomas S. Onder, Esq., Shareholder and Chair of the Firm’s Shopping Center & Retail Development...

    Stark & Stark’s Joseph H. Lemkin Esq., Named 2026 Professional Lawyer of the Year for the Jewish Bar Association of New Jersey

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Joseph H. Lemkin Esq. has been selected by the New Jersey Commission on Professionalism in the Law as...

    Our Values Remain: A Message on the Closing of Diversity Lab

    Stark & Stark is saddened and disappointed to learn that Diversity Lab, the organization that created and manages the Mansfield Certification...

    Congratulations to Shareholder Bhaveen R. Jani, Esq. on his Installation as Treasurer of the Middlesex County Bar Foundation

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Shareholder Bhaveen R. Jani, Esq. has been installed as Treasurer of the Middlesex County Bar Foundation,...

    Denise Mariani, Esq., and Jonathan Lauri, Esq. Secure $750,000 Jury Verdict Against Hamilton Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

    It is our pleasure to announce that Denise Mariani, Esq., and Jonathan Lauri, Esq., secured a $750,000 jury verdict on behalf of a nursing home...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes 2026 Summer Law Clerks

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce its 10th Annual Summer Law Clerk Program. Five Summer Law Clerks will join the firm from June through July...

    Retail Development Team Secures Major Recovery for Landlord Client Amid Bankruptcy Dispute

    Our Shopping Center and Retail Development Group recently secured a multi-million-dollar settlement for a commercial landlord client' s property...

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Catherine Foley, Esq. Secure $950,000 Settlement in Surgical Malpractice Matter

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Catherine Foley, Esq. recently secured a confidential $950,000 settlement in a surgical malpractice case. “This...

    Victoria Wilton, Esq. Selected to Serve on New Jersey State Bar Association Family Law Executive Committee

    We are proud to announce that Victoria Wilton, Esq. has been selected to serve on the New Jersey State Bar Association Family Law Executive Committee...