• People

    Advanced Search

  • Services
  • All Services

  • If an alimony recipient lives with an unrelated person, the cohabitation may justify a modification or termination of an alimony obligation. The Courts look at two things:

    1. Is there “cohabitation” by the alimony recipient? If yes, the dependent spouse will have the burden to prove a continued financial need based on his or her individual economic circumstances in order to preserve alimony payments.
    2. What is the economic effect of his or her cohabitation and does it warrant termination or modification of the supporting spouse’s payment of alimony? Assessment of financial need rests on whether there is a decrease in need (a) because he or she is receiving support from the person with whom he or she is cohabiting, or (b) due to the probability that the alimony is being used to support the person with whom he or she is cohabiting. Because this is generally only known by the dependent, the burden to prove continued financial need falls on the recipient of the alimony. If he or she does not come forward, the payer should be entitled to terminate his or her alimony obligation.

    In many cases, the effect of cohabitation on the alimony obligation will be specifically addressed in a Marital Settlement or Property Settlement Agreement. In cases where neither Agreement specifically addresses the issue of cohabitation, the Courts have held that state case law applies. In these cases, the Court must analyze seven factors to assess the nature of the relationship and determine whether alimony should be suspended or terminated as a result of the cohabitation:

    1. Intertwined finances such as joint bank accounts and other joint holdings or liabilities;
    2. Shared or joint responsibility for living expenses;
    3. Recognition of the relationship in the couple’s social family circle;
    4. Shared premise, frequency of contact, duration of the relationship, and other indicia of a mutually supportive intimate personal relationship;
    5. Shared household chores;
    6. Whether the recipient of alimony has received an enforceable promise of support from another person; and,
    7. All other relevant evidence.

    The Courts use the length of the relationship as a deciding factor to determine whether a suspension or modification of an alimony obligation is appropriate. The longer the cohabitation, the more likely a change in alimony is warranted.

    Contact a New Jersey Cohabitation Lawyer or Leave Us a Message

    Firm Highlights

    Bruce H. Stern, Esq. Secures $5.5 Million Settlement for Traumatic Brain Injury Victim

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Shareholder Bruce H. Stern, Esq., Certified Civil Trial Attorney and member of the firm’s Accident...

    “Best Law Firms” 2027 List Issued by Best Lawyers Recognizes Stark & Stark PC

    We are proud to announce that the firm has been included in the 2027 Edition of Best Lawyers “Best Law Firms®” list, earning 11 regional...

    Bruce H. Stern, Esq. Secures $950,000 Settlement for Traumatic Brain Injury Client

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Shareholder Bruce H. Stern, Esq., Certified Civil Trial Attorney and member of the firm's Accident...

    Evan J. Lide, Esq. Secures $2.15 Million Wrongful Death Settlement

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Shareholder Evan J. Lide, Esq. recently secured a $2,150,000 settlement on behalf of the family of a...

    Evan J. Lide, Esq. and J. Robert Bratman, Esq. Secure $1,250,000 Settlement for Injured Bicyclist Hit by Commercial Vehicle

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Shareholders Evan J. Lide, Esq. and J. Robert Bratman, Esq., both Certified Civil Trial Attorneys and...

    Stark & Stark Attorneys Recognized as New Jersey “Super Lawyers” and “Rising Stars” in 2027

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that 16 of its attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the list of 2027 New Jersey Super Lawyers,...

    8 Ways to Support a Loved One Living With Dementia

    If someone you love is living with Alzheimer's or another form of dementia, you already know how much the small moments matter. How you greet them,...

    Stark & Stark’s Chinsu Shajan, Esq. Receives Mercer County Bar Association Rising Leader Award

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Chinsu Shajan, Esq., a Shareholder in the Firm’s Accident & Personal Injury Group, was honored by...

    Michael H. Foster, Esq. and Stephen M. Di Stefano, Esq. Secure $5.5 Million Settlement for Victim of Motor Vehicle Crash

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Michael H. Foster, Esq. and Stephen M. Di Stefano, Esq., both Certified Civil Trial Attorneys and...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes Nicholas Giaquinto

    Stark & Stark is pleased to welcome Nicholas Giaquinto as a Law Clerk in the firm’s Banking & Financial Services Group and Commercial...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes New Associate Michael Diaz, Esq.

    Stark & Stark is pleased to welcome Michael Diaz, Esq. as a new Associate in the firm's Accident & Personal Injury Group.  Before joining...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes New Associate Alex Miller, Esq.

    Stark & Stark is pleased to welcome Alex Miller, Esq. as a new Associate in the firm's Accident & Personal Injury Group, where he will...