• People

    Advanced Search

  • Services
  • All Services

  • Back to News & Media
    Blog

    Permanent Alimony vs. Open Durational Alimony

    November 3, 2014

     Download as PDF

    The new alimony law that was recently passed on September 10, 2014, changed one of the types of alimony from “permanent” to “open durational.” It was really just a change in semantics. Permanent alimony was never meant to be “lifetime” alimony as many clients called it. Under our previous law, permanent alimony could have been modified upon a substantial change in circumstances, such as disability, unemployment, retirement, or a change in need by the payee or change in ability to pay by the payor. Open durational alimony, which has an open term until the court terminates it or the parties agree to terminate it, generally applies to marriages over 20 years in length. This type of alimony can also be modified (reduced or terminated) upon a substantial change in circumstances.

    What the new law does give us is some guidance when dealing with substantial changes in circumstances. Prior to the new law’s enactment, we only had case law to help with modification applications.

    For example, retirement is a substantial change in circumstance for which modification of alimony would have been considered under case law. Under the new alimony statute, there is a rebuttable presumption that alimony shall terminate upon the payor spouse obtaining full retirement age, which is Social Security retirement age. The law also provides that the court may set a different alimony termination date if the rebuttable presumption is overcome. The factors to consider in rebutting the presumption are as follows:

    1. The ages of the parties at the time of the application for retirement.
    2. The ages of the parties at the time of the marriage or civil union and their ages at the time of entry of the alimony award.
    3. The degree and duration of the economic dependency of the recipient upon the payor during the marriage or civil union.
    4. Whether the recipient has foregone or relinquished or otherwise sacrificed claims, rights or property in exchange for a more substantial or longer alimony award.
    5. The duration or amount of alimony already paid.
    6. The health of the parties at the time of the retirement application.
    7. Assets of the parties at the time of the retirement application.
    8. Whether the recipient has reached full retirement age as defined in this section.
    9. Sources of income, both earned and unearned, of the parties.
    10. The ability of the recipient to have saved adequately for retirement.
    11. Any other factors that the court may deem relevant.

    If the paying spouse retires prior to attaining full retirement age, then he/she has the burden of demonstrating that the actual retirement is reasonable and made in good faith.

    Other blogs have been posted to this site on the new alimony law and how it effects other changes in circumstances such as cohabitation and unemployment.

    Key Contact

    Maria P. Imbalzano
    609.895.7264

    Firm Highlights

    Bruce H. Stern, Esq. Secures $5.5 Million Settlement for Traumatic Brain Injury Victim

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Shareholder Bruce H. Stern, Esq., Certified Civil Trial Attorney and member of the firm’s Accident...

    “Best Law Firms” 2027 List Issued by Best Lawyers Recognizes Stark & Stark PC

    We are proud to announce that the firm has been included in the 2027 Edition of Best Lawyers “Best Law Firms®” list, earning 11 regional...

    Bruce H. Stern, Esq. Secures $950,000 Settlement for Traumatic Brain Injury Client

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Shareholder Bruce H. Stern, Esq., Certified Civil Trial Attorney and member of the firm's Accident...

    Evan J. Lide, Esq. Secures $2.15 Million Wrongful Death Settlement

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Shareholder Evan J. Lide, Esq. recently secured a $2,150,000 settlement on behalf of the family of a...

    Evan J. Lide, Esq. and J. Robert Bratman, Esq. Secure $1,250,000 Settlement for Injured Bicyclist Hit by Commercial Vehicle

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Shareholders Evan J. Lide, Esq. and J. Robert Bratman, Esq., both Certified Civil Trial Attorneys and...

    Stark & Stark Attorneys Recognized as New Jersey “Super Lawyers” and “Rising Stars” in 2027

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that 16 of its attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the list of 2027 New Jersey Super Lawyers,...

    8 Ways to Support a Loved One Living With Dementia

    If someone you love is living with Alzheimer's or another form of dementia, you already know how much the small moments matter. How you greet them,...

    Stark & Stark’s Chinsu Shajan, Esq. Receives Mercer County Bar Association Rising Leader Award

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Chinsu Shajan, Esq., a Shareholder in the Firm’s Accident & Personal Injury Group, was honored by...

    Michael H. Foster, Esq. and Stephen M. Di Stefano, Esq. Secure $5.5 Million Settlement for Victim of Motor Vehicle Crash

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Michael H. Foster, Esq. and Stephen M. Di Stefano, Esq., both Certified Civil Trial Attorneys and...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes Nicholas Giaquinto

    Stark & Stark is pleased to welcome Nicholas Giaquinto as a Law Clerk in the firm’s Banking & Financial Services Group and Commercial...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes New Associate Michael Diaz, Esq.

    Stark & Stark is pleased to welcome Michael Diaz, Esq. as a new Associate in the firm's Accident & Personal Injury Group.  Before joining...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes New Associate Alex Miller, Esq.

    Stark & Stark is pleased to welcome Alex Miller, Esq. as a new Associate in the firm's Accident & Personal Injury Group, where he will...