• People

    Advanced Search

  • Services
  • All Services

  • Key takeaways:

    • A major federal court ruling now requires plaintiffs alleging stomach paralysis to have a diagnosis confirmed by specific medical testing, like a gastric emptying study.
    • A significant and growing number of lawsuits now focus on severe vision injuries, including irreversible blindness, which are being pursued in both federal and New Jersey state courts.
    • While some claims against the drug manufacturers were dismissed, the court allowed core allegations of misleading marketing and failure to warn about gastroparesis to proceed.
    • New medical studies continue to emerge, suggesting potential links between these drugs and other serious conditions, including retinal vein occlusion and macular degeneration.
    • The litigation is advancing on two main fronts: gastroparesis claims centralized in a Philadelphia federal court and vision injury claims gaining momentum in New Jersey.

    A Critical Ruling Reshapes Gastroparesis Lawsuits

    A recent order from the federal judge overseeing the national Ozempic multidistrict litigation (MDL) has established a new standard for stomach paralysis claims. This decision directly impacts who may qualify to move forward with a lawsuit.

    The Gastric Emptying Study Requirement

    The court ruled that any plaintiff claiming to suffer from gastroparesis must have a diagnosis confirmed by objective medical evidence. This means a doctor’s clinical impression alone is not enough. 

    The diagnosis must be based on a properly performed gastric emptying study or a similar validated test. This ruling clarifies the evidence required for these specific claims. It sets a clear standard that attorneys must meet when filing a gastroparesis case on behalf of a client.

    • A confirmed diagnosis via a gastric emptying study (scintigraphy).
    • Diagnosis confirmed through a wireless motility capsule (WMC).
    • Diagnosis supported by a gastric emptying breath test.

    While this requirement may exclude some individuals who did not receive this specific testing, it strengthens the cases for those who have this definitive proof. It provides a solid, scientific foundation for claims moving forward in the litigation.

    What Claims Did the Court Allow to Proceed?

    The drug manufacturers asked the court to dismiss many of the claims against them. Judge Karen Spencer Marston’s ruling was a mixed result. She dismissed claims related to design defects but allowed the central allegations to survive. This means the fight for accountability continues on key issues of corporate responsibility.

    The court rejected the defense’s argument that their marketing was mere “puffery.” It found that plaintiffs had sufficiently identified specific safety claims that could have misled patients. Most importantly, claims that the manufacturers failed to warn about gastroparesis on the drug’s label will proceed.

    The Emerging Front: Severe Vision Injury Lawsuits

    While gastroparesis initially defined the litigation, a second and equally serious category of injuries has come into focus: permanent vision loss. These cases are now generating significant attention from both the legal and medical communities.

    The Rise of NAION Claims in New Jersey

    A growing number of plaintiffs are filing lawsuits in New Jersey state court alleging that Ozempic and Wegovy caused an irreversible condition called non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). 

    This condition involves a sudden loss of blood flow to the optic nerve, causing permanent blindness.

    Over 30 plaintiffs have petitioned to consolidate these cases into a multicounty litigation (MCL) in New Jersey. Similar to a federal MDL, this process streamlines pretrial proceedings for efficiency and consistency.

    New Medical Research Raises More Concerns

    The legal claims are being bolstered by emerging scientific research. A recent study in JAMA Ophthalmology found a potential link between these drugs and other serious eye conditions. These findings add to the body of evidence suggesting the vascular effects of these medications might have unintended consequences. Which is why many turn to a defective drugs & medical devices lawyer for guidance and accountability.

    A Two-Front Battle: Federal MDL and State Courts

    The legal strategy for holding manufacturers accountable is now advancing in two distinct arenas. This dual approach allows attorneys to pursue justice for different types of injuries in the venues best suited for those claims.

    The Gastroparesis MDL in Philadelphia

    The federal MDL in Philadelphia remains the central hub for all stomach paralysis cases filed in federal courts across the country. With over 2,000 cases, this litigation will focus on what the companies knew about gastroparesis risks.

    New Jersey’s Focus on Vision Injuries

    The push to create a separate, coordinated proceeding in New Jersey for NAION claims highlights the unique scientific evidence tied to vision loss. Pursuing these cases in state court may offer a different path to trial, potentially avoiding procedural hurdles that can slow down federal MDLs.

    What These Updates Mean for Patients

    These recent developments provide both clarity and direction. For those with confirmed gastroparesis, the path forward in the federal MDL is more defined. For those who have suffered vision loss, the growing focus in New Jersey state courts offers a promising new avenue for accountability. The legal system is actively working through these complex scientific and factual issues.

    FAQ for Ozempic and Wegovy Lawsuits

    What is the difference between the federal MDL and the New Jersey MCL?

    The federal MDL, located in Philadelphia, consolidates all federal lawsuits alleging gastroparesis. The proposed New Jersey MCL would consolidate state-level lawsuits specifically alleging vision loss injuries like NAION. They are separate proceedings focused on different primary injuries.

    Do I need to have a gastric emptying study before I can contact an attorney?

    No. If you have been diagnosed with gastroparesis or are suffering from its severe symptoms after taking Ozempic or Wegovy, you can still seek a legal consultation. An attorney can review your medical history and help you understand if additional testing might be necessary for your claim.

    What is NAION and how is it related to these drugs?

    NAION is a sudden and permanent vision loss caused by a lack of blood flow to the optic nerve. Lawsuits allege that the vascular effects of drugs like Ozempic may contribute to or cause this condition, and that the manufacturer failed to warn of this risk.

    Is it too late for me to consider filing a lawsuit?

    Every state has a time limit for filing a personal injury claim, known as a statute of limitations. Because information about these severe side effects is still emerging, it is important to act quickly to protect your rights. Consulting with an attorney can help you determine the deadline for your situation.

    Let Us Review Your Case

    The personal injury attorneys at Stark & Stark closely monitor all developments in the Ozempic and Wegovy lawsuits in both federal and state courts. If you or a family member suffered from severe gastroparesis or vision loss after using these medications in New Jersey or Pennsylvania, we are here to help. 

    Call us at 800.535.3425 for a free, confidential case evaluation.

    Speak with an Experienced Attorney Today

    Key Contacts

    Martin P. Schrama
    609.895.7261
    Personal Injury Law Blog
    March 6, 2026
    Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, and Zepbound have become widely recognized medications in recent years, offering significant benefits for managing type 2...
    Personal Injury Law Blog
    September 5, 2025
    Key takeaways: Lawsuits claim that Novo Nordisk, the manufacturer, did not sufficiently warn doctors and patients about the risk of severe...
    Personal Injury Law Blog
    June 20, 2025
    What types of eye injuries does Ozempic/Wegovy cause? Ozempic/Wegovy are two of the most common weight-loss medications known as GLP-1 drugs. Other...

    Firm Highlights

    Stark & Stark Joins Growing Coalition of Law Firms in Defense of Constitutional Principles and the Independence of the Legal Profession

    Stark & Stark has joined hundreds of fellow law firms across the country in filing an amicus brief supporting Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, Jenner...

    Stark & Stark Attorneys Recognized as New Jersey “Super Lawyers” and “Rising Stars” in 2026

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that 15 of its attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the list of 2026 New Jersey Super Lawyers,...

    Bruce Stern, Esq. Secures $1,000,000 Settlement in Motor Vehicle Collision Case

    Bruce Stern, Esq. recently secured a $1,000,000 settlement in a motor vehicle collision case.* “This case highlights how quickly things can go...

    Deborah Dunn, Esq. Elected to Board of Directors for Angel Flight East

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Deborah Dunn, Esq., Shareholder and Civil Trial Attorney, has been elected to the Board of Directors...

    Michael Jordan, Esq. Joins the Board of the Lawrence Township Community Foundation

    It is our pleasure to announce that Michael Jordan, Esq. has joined the board of the Lawrence Township Community Foundation, an organization...

    Stark & Stark Opens Newtown, Pennsylvania Location

    Stark & Stark announced the relocation of its Yardley, Pennsylvania office to a new location in Newtown, PA. The new office is now open and...

    Joseph Lemkin, Esq. Named to ROI-NJ Influencers: Power List 2026 – Law

    Stark & Stark is proud to share that Joseph Lemkin, Esq., Shareholder, has been named to the 2026 Influencers: Power List in the Law category...

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Michael C. Ksiazek, Esq. Secure $1,000,000 Settlement in Medical Malpractice Wrongful Death Case

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Michael C. Ksiazek, Esq. recently secured a $1,000,000 settlement in a medical malpractice wrongful death...

    Joseph Cullen, Esq. and Nicole Durso, Esq. Secure $2,000,000 Settlement in Personal Injury Matter

    Joseph Cullen, Esq. and Nicole Durso, Esq. recently secured a $2,000,000 settlement in a personal injury matter involving a pedestrian who was struck...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes Susan L. Swatski, Esq. to the Firm

    Continuing in its mission to provide its clients innovative legal solutions to meet their needs, Stark & Stark PC, announced today that Susan L....

    Tim Duggan Wins Eminent Domain Challenge – Case Dismissed

    We are pleased to share that Tim Duggan of our Condemnation, Redevelopment, and Eminent Domain Group was successful in protecting the owner of a...

    James Creegan, Esq. Appointed to Board of The 200 Club of Mercer County

    It is our pleasure to announce that James Creegan, Esq. has been appointed to the Board of Directors of The 200 Club of Mercer County, an...