As the economy continues to restrict the availability of credit to small businesses, many borrowers are finding that lenders with which they have had long and mutually beneficial relationships have been restricting lines of credit or adding additional requisites to extend or renew existing lines of credit. Principals of newer small businesses may be shopping for credit for the first time, or are presented with a first commercial lease. One requirement that is becoming ubiquitous in lending and leasing in Pennsylvania is a Confession of Judgment clause in loan agreements, often accompanied by personal guarantees. This article will give consumers of credit a brief primer on what Confessions of Judgment are, and what rights a borrower is waiving by signing one.
A Confession of Judgment is a written agreement entered between a lender and a borrower that allows the lender to summarily enter Judgment against the borrower upon the occurrence of a stated event, usually default under the terms of a loan agreement or lease. A Confession of Judgment differs from normal civil actions to collect a debt in that the borrower essentially waives his due process rights to a trial and permits the lender to proceed directly to a Judgment without giving evidence, holding a Court hearing, allowing the borrower to present a defense or even giving the borrower notice that the lender intends to enter the judgment. A Confession of Judgment provision is designed to give the lender a quick, easy, and low cost method to obtain a Judgment against a delinquent borrower or lessee and to preserve the priority of the lenders lien. Proceeding upon a Confession of Judgment is extremely quick compared with the time, cost, and expense associated with normal civil actions.
Though their use in commercial transactions seems to be growing, Confessions of Judgment in Pennsylvania actually pre-date the formation of the Commonwealth and enjoy a lengthy history, long being criticized for their susceptibility to be employed in predatory ways against the unwary borrower. A creature of English common law, the author Charles Dickens noted Confessions of Judgments – then called “cognovits” – with disfavor in his first novel The Pickwick Papers. The United States Supreme Court, quoting a 1824 New Jersey opinion, noted that Confessions of Judgment are “the loosest way of binding a man’s property that ever was devised in any civilized country.” Many states have altogether invalidated Confessions of Judgment under their respective State Constitutions, and Pennsylvania remains one of the very few jurisdictions that permits them at all. In 1996, however, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court restricted the use of Confessions of Judgment to non-consumer debts – and now Confessions of Judgment can only be used in association with commercial transactions in the Commonwealth.
Once a Judgment is entered by Confession, a delinquent borrower or lessee will receive a notice from the Court notifying the borrower that the Judgment has been entered. The lender can then begin execution efforts and levy the borrowers property within 30 days. If the loan agreement has a personal guarantee, the lender may confess judgment against the individual and execute against his property in short order. The only recourse that a borrower at this point is to Petition the Court to Strike or Open the Judgment, and to file a separate emergency Motion to Stay the execution of the Judgment, though it is possible that a Court will not stay execution of a Judgment while a Petition to Strike or Open is pending.
As one can see, a Confession of Judgment clause in a commercial loan or lease should not be taken lightly, and a prospective borrower or lessee should be aware of the severe consequences if the lender or lessor elects to enforce a Confession of Judgment.
Stark & Stark Attorneys Recognized as New Jersey “Super Lawyers” and “Rising Stars” in 2026
Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that 15 of its attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the list of 2026 New Jersey Super Lawyers,...Bruce Stern, Esq. Secures $1,000,000 Settlement in Motor Vehicle Collision Case
Bruce Stern, Esq. recently secured a $1,000,000 settlement in a motor vehicle collision case.* “This case highlights how quickly things can go...Deborah Dunn, Esq. Elected to Board of Directors for Angel Flight East
Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Deborah Dunn, Esq., Shareholder and Civil Trial Attorney, has been elected to the Board of Directors...Michael Jordan, Esq. Joins the Board of the Lawrence Township Community Foundation
It is our pleasure to announce that Michael Jordan, Esq. has joined the board of the Lawrence Township Community Foundation, an organization...Joseph Lemkin, Esq. Named to ROI-NJ Influencers: Power List 2026 – Law
Stark & Stark is proud to share that Joseph Lemkin, Esq., Shareholder, has been named to the 2026 Influencers: Power List in the Law category...Joseph Cullen, Esq. and Nicole Durso, Esq. Secure $2,000,000 Settlement in Personal Injury Matter
Joseph Cullen, Esq. and Nicole Durso, Esq. recently secured a $2,000,000 settlement in a personal injury matter involving a pedestrian who was struck...