On December 23, 2020, then Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law NY CLS Fin Serv §§ 801-812 (the “Disclosure Law”) with the intended purpose of “requiring certain providers that extend specific terms of commercial financing to a recipient to disclose certain information about the offer to the recipient.” Although the law was slated to take effect January 1, 2022, the New York Department of Financial Services (“DFS”) issued a guidance on December 31, 2021, stating that the “obligations do not arise until the [DFS] issues final implementing regulations and those regulations take effect.” Given the latest regulations proposed by DFS provide for a compliance date six months after publication of the Notice of Adoption in the State Register, companies have until at least the summer of 2022 to comply with the Disclosure Law.
First, it is important to note that the Disclosure Law includes several notable exceptions particularly relevant to our clients. Notably, the Disclosure Law does not apply to:
In the event the lender falls into one of the above criteria, then the Disclosure Law is inapplicable.
Assuming the company does not fall into an exempted category, the Disclosure Law envisages four main types of financial transactions which require disclosures: Sales-based financing, Closed-end commercial financing, Open-end commercial financing, and Factoring transaction. Each one comes with its own individual disclosure requirements.
Sales-based financing under the Disclosure Law is defined as a transaction that is repaid by the recipient to the provider, over time, as a percentage of sales or revenue, in which the payment amount may increase or decrease according to the volume of sales made or revenue received by the recipient. This also includes a true-up mechanism where the financing is repaid as a fixed payment but provides for a reconciliation process that adjusts the payment to an amount that is a percentage of sales or revenue.
For Sales-based financing, at the time a provider extends an offer, the provider must disclose:
Closed-end commercial financing under the Disclosure Law is defined as a closed-end extension of credit, secured or unsecured, including equipment financing that does not meet the definition of a lease under section 2-A-103 of the uniform commercial code, the proceeds of which the recipient does not intend to use primarily for personal, family or household purposes. This also includes financing with an established principal amount and duration.
For Closed-end commercial financing, at the time a provider extends an offer, the provider must disclose:
Open-end commercial financing under the Disclosure Law is defined as an agreement for one or more extensions of open-end credit, secured or unsecured, the proceeds of which the recipient does not intend to use primarily for personal, family or household purposes. This also includes credit extended by a provider under a plan in which: (i) the provider reasonably contemplates repeated transactions; (ii) the provider may impose a finance charge from time to time on an outstanding unpaid balance; and (iii) the amount of credit that may be extended to the recipient during the term of the plan (up to any limit set by the provider) is generally made available to the extent that any outstanding balance is repaid.
For Open-end commercial financing, at the time a provider extends an offer, the provider must disclose:
A Factoring transaction under the Disclosure Law is defined as an accounts receivable purchase transaction that includes an agreement to purchase, transfer, or sell a legally enforceable claim for payment held by a recipient for goods the recipient has supplied or services the recipient has rendered that have been ordered but for which payment has not yet been made.
For Factoring transactions, at the time a provider extends an offer, the provide must disclose:
Although the Disclosure Law contemplates the above four types of transactions, it also includes a section which permits the superintendent of the DFS, in his or her discretion, to require disclosure by a provider offering commercial financing which does not fall into one of the above four categories.
In the event the superintendent requires disclosure for such other transactions, the provider must disclose at the time an offer is made:
If a provider is considering a transaction which requires the recipient to pay off an existing commercial financing from the same provider, then the provider must disclose:
Providers are required to obtain recipients signatures (which can be electronic) on all disclosures before authorizing the proceeding of a loan application.
Upon a finding by the superintendent of DFS of a violation of the Disclosure Law, the offending company will be penalized Two Thousand ($2,000) Dollars for each violation or Ten Thousand ($10,000) Dollars for each violation in the even the violation was “willful”. If the superintendent of DFS finds a provider knowingly violation of the Disclosure Law, it can also impose restitution payments or a permanent or preliminary injunction on behalf of a recipient affected by the violation.
Retail Development Team Secures Major Recovery for Landlord Client Amid Bankruptcy Dispute
Our Shopping Center and Retail Development Group recently secured a multi-million-dollar settlement for a commercial landlord client' s property...Stark & Stark Attorneys Recognized as New Jersey “Super Lawyers” and “Rising Stars” in 2026
Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that 15 of its attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the list of 2026 New Jersey Super Lawyers,...Bruce Stern, Esq. Secures $1,000,000 Settlement in Motor Vehicle Collision Case
Bruce Stern, Esq. recently secured a $1,000,000 settlement in a motor vehicle collision case.* “This case highlights how quickly things can go...Deborah Dunn, Esq. Elected to Board of Directors for Angel Flight East
Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Deborah Dunn, Esq., Shareholder and Civil Trial Attorney, has been elected to the Board of Directors...Michael Jordan, Esq. Joins the Board of the Lawrence Township Community Foundation
It is our pleasure to announce that Michael Jordan, Esq. has joined the board of the Lawrence Township Community Foundation, an organization...Joseph Lemkin, Esq. Named to ROI-NJ Influencers: Power List 2026 – Law
Stark & Stark is proud to share that Joseph Lemkin, Esq., Shareholder, has been named to the 2026 Influencers: Power List in the Law category...Joseph Cullen, Esq. and Nicole Durso, Esq. Secure $2,000,000 Settlement in Personal Injury Matter
Joseph Cullen, Esq. and Nicole Durso, Esq. recently secured a $2,000,000 settlement in a personal injury matter involving a pedestrian who was struck...