• People

    Advanced Search

  • Services
  • All Services

  • Back to News & Media
    Blog

    Injured on NJ Transit? How New Jersey Common Carrier Law Protects Passengers

    February 19, 2026

     Download as PDF

    Every day, hundreds of thousands of New Jersey residents step onto buses, trains, light rail, and airport rail systems to get to work, school, and home. Most riders reasonably assume that public transit operators will keep them safe. Sadly, accidents happen; drivers make mistakes, and conductors can hit the brakes just a little bit too hard.

    What many people do not realize is that New Jersey law does not just expect transit operators to be careful. It holds them to a higher legal standard than ordinary drivers or property owners.

    What Is a Common Carrier Under New Jersey Law?

    Under New Jersey law, a common carrier is an entity that holds itself out to the public as being in the business of transporting passengers for pay. This includes public transportation systems operating on fixed routes (think buses, commuter trains, and rail systems connecting airports to transit hubs).

    The New Jersey Supreme Court has made this clear. In Maison v. NJ Transit Corp., the Court held that public transit systems, such as NJ Transit, are common carriers and are subject to the same legal duties as private transportation companies. Ownership of the vehicle does not matter. What matters is the function: carrying passengers who have paid for a ride.

    That same reasoning applies to rail systems operated by public agencies like the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, including airport rail lines that transport fare-paying passengers between terminals and train stations.

    The Higher Duty of Care for Common Carriers in New Jersey

    Now, because common carriers transport people who have little or no ability to protect themselves and trust that the carrier with get them to their destination safely, New Jersey law requires them to exercise the highest degree of care consistent with the nature of the undertaking.

    In practical terms, this means transit operators must act with:

    • The utmost caution
    • The care of careful and prudent persons
    • Heightened attention to passenger safety during normal operations

    This standard has existed in New Jersey law for over a century, and the Supreme Court reaffirmed it in Maison. The basis for this higher standard is that passengers entrust their safety, and often their lives, to the carrier while confined in a moving vehicle. The law recognizes that imbalance and responds by demanding more from the carrier.

    Importantly, the Court also made clear that public agencies do not get a pass simply because they are government entities. The Tort Claims Act, which offers numerous immunities to government agencies that deserves a separate blog in itself, does not lower the duty of care owed by public transit operators.

    Why New Jersey Common Carrier Law Matters to Injured Riders

    This heightened duty of care is not just a legal technicality. It means that there are real consequences when a passenger is hurt due to the common carrier conduct.

    For example, a common carrier must take particular care in how a train or bus is:

    • Started
    • Stopped
    • Accelerated
    • Braked in emergencies

    Abrupt or unnecessary emergency braking, unsafe operation, or failures in monitoring passenger safety can expose riders, especially standing passengers, to serious injury. When that happens, the law does not judge the carrier by ordinary negligence standards. It holds them to the higher common-carrier standard.

    The Court, Not a Jury, Decides this Standard.

    Another key point that often surprises people: whether a transit operator is a common carrier is not a question for a jury. Said another way, one does not need to a jury of their peers to make this determine, the Judge assigned to the case shall make that decision.

    New Jersey courts have repeatedly held that common-carrier status, and the duty of care that comes with it, is a legal determination made by the judge. When the facts are undisputed, such as when a passenger buys a train ticket and then is injured while being transported, the heightened standard applies as a matter of law.

    The Bottom Line

    If you regularly ride buses or trains in New Jersey, the law is on your side.

    Transit operators are not merely expected to act reasonably. Rather, they are required to exercise the highest level of care consistent with transporting the public. That higher standard exists because passengers deserve it, and because public transportation only works when riders can trust that their safety is being treated as a top priority.

    Therefore, when you board a bus or train, you place your safety in someone else’s hands. New Jersey law honors that trust by demanding the highest level of care from those who transport the public.

    Key Contact

    John C. Lowenberg
    609.895.7312

    Firm Highlights

    Stark & Stark Shareholder Deborah S. Dunn, Esq. Installed as 2nd Vice President and Diversity Officer of the New Jersey Association for Justice for 2026–2027

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Shareholder Deborah S. Dunn, Esq. has been installed as 2nd Vice President and Diversity Officer of the...

    Stark & Stark Recognized with Community Partner Award by Mercer County Community College Foundation

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that the firm has been recognized with the Community Partner Award by the Mercer County Community College...

    Carin A. O’Donnell, Esq. Inducted as 2026-2027 President of the Pennsylvania Association for Justice

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Carin A. O'Donnell, Esq. was sworn in as the 2026-2027 President of the Pennsylvania Association for...

    Stark & Stark’s Thomas S. Onder, Esq. Receives 2026 ICSC Trustees’ Distinguished Service Award

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Thomas S. Onder, Esq., Shareholder and Chair of the Firm’s Shopping Center & Retail Development...

    Stark & Stark’s Joseph H. Lemkin Esq., Named 2026 Professional Lawyer of the Year for the Jewish Bar Association of New Jersey

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Joseph H. Lemkin Esq. has been selected by the New Jersey Commission on Professionalism in the Law as...

    Our Values Remain: A Message on the Closing of Diversity Lab

    Stark & Stark is saddened and disappointed to learn that Diversity Lab, the organization that created and manages the Mansfield Certification...

    Congratulations to Shareholder Bhaveen R. Jani, Esq. on his Installation as Treasurer of the Middlesex County Bar Foundation

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Shareholder Bhaveen R. Jani, Esq. has been installed as Treasurer of the Middlesex County Bar Foundation,...

    Denise Mariani, Esq., and Jonathan Lauri, Esq. Secure $750,000 Jury Verdict Against Hamilton Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

    It is our pleasure to announce that Denise Mariani, Esq., and Jonathan Lauri, Esq., secured a $750,000 jury verdict on behalf of a nursing home...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes 2026 Summer Law Clerks

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce its 10th Annual Summer Law Clerk Program. Five Summer Law Clerks will join the firm from June through July...

    Retail Development Team Secures Major Recovery for Landlord Client Amid Bankruptcy Dispute

    Our Shopping Center and Retail Development Group recently secured a multi-million-dollar settlement for a commercial landlord client' s property...

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Catherine Foley, Esq. Secure $950,000 Settlement in Surgical Malpractice Matter

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Catherine Foley, Esq. recently secured a confidential $950,000 settlement in a surgical malpractice case. “This...

    Victoria Wilton, Esq. Selected to Serve on New Jersey State Bar Association Family Law Executive Committee

    We are proud to announce that Victoria Wilton, Esq. has been selected to serve on the New Jersey State Bar Association Family Law Executive Committee...