• People

    Advanced Search

  • Services
  • All Services

  • Back to News & Media
    Blog

    Increasing Assessments Mid-Year

    October 27, 2025

     Download as PDF

    When preparing a community association budget at the start of each fiscal year, boards and their managers could use a good Crystal Ball; but too often they may feel like they are using a Magic 8 Ball instead: “cannot predict now” or “ask again later.” Yet a budget must still be prepared based on available information and realistic assumptions. When the board determines mid-year that the annual assessment is insufficient for the association’s needs, it must understand the available options for increasing assessments.

    community association budget increase mid year

    Special Assessment

    A special assessment is an additional assessment on top of the annual assessment and can be a one-time lump sum or paid in multiple installments. The board may have the authority to impose a special assessment but sometimes the approval of unit owners is required. A common misunderstanding is that if unit owners reject a special assessment, the assessments cannot be increased. That is not true. The board must fund necessary common expenses and the needed funds will be obtained from unit owners in another way.

    Amending the Budget

    Governing documents routinely authorize boards to amend the budget mid-year if the annual assessment is insufficient. An amended budget can provide needed assessments in the same way as a special assessment, except the funds must be collected over the course of the remaining fiscal year.

    Emergency Assessment

    With sufficient authority the board can impose an emergency assessment for an immediate or emergent need. Any board imposing an emergency assessment must be prepared to provide facts—and sometimes expert opinion—supporting the need for the funds and what constitutes the immediate or emergent need.

    Structural Integrity Assessment

    Regardless of any approval requirements in the governing documents, the structural integrity law (S2760/A4384) authorizes a board to impose an assessment to pay for the cost of corrective maintenance of the primary load bearing system of a covered building. Prior to imposing a structural integrity assessment, the board must obtain a written report from a New Jersey licensed engineer or architect stating that the failure to undertake the corrective maintenance will:

    • constitute an imminent or reasonably foreseeable hazard to health or safety;
    • constitute a violation of the structural integrity law; or
    • will result in a material increase in the cost of such corrective maintenance if delayed.

    The assessment can be imposed over one or more fiscal years.

    Boards have a duty to impose assessments which are sufficient to meet common expenses, and sometimes changes must be made mid-fiscal year. When that occurs, the board must know their options and properly implement changes. If your board is considering a mid-year assessment change, those options and procedures should be reviewed with the association’s legal counsel.

    Key Contact

    Mary W. Barrett
    609.896.9060

    Firm Highlights

    Stark & Stark Joins Growing Coalition of Law Firms in Defense of Constitutional Principles and the Independence of the Legal Profession

    Stark & Stark has joined hundreds of fellow law firms across the country in filing an amicus brief supporting Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, Jenner...

    Stark & Stark Attorneys Recognized as New Jersey “Super Lawyers” and “Rising Stars” in 2026

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that 15 of its attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the list of 2026 New Jersey Super Lawyers,...

    Bruce Stern, Esq. Secures $1,000,000 Settlement in Motor Vehicle Collision Case

    Bruce Stern, Esq. recently secured a $1,000,000 settlement in a motor vehicle collision case.* “This case highlights how quickly things can go...

    Deborah Dunn, Esq. Elected to Board of Directors for Angel Flight East

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Deborah Dunn, Esq., Shareholder and Civil Trial Attorney, has been elected to the Board of Directors...

    Michael Jordan, Esq. Joins the Board of the Lawrence Township Community Foundation

    It is our pleasure to announce that Michael Jordan, Esq. has joined the board of the Lawrence Township Community Foundation, an organization...

    Stark & Stark Opens Newtown, Pennsylvania Location

    Stark & Stark announced the relocation of its Yardley, Pennsylvania office to a new location in Newtown, PA. The new office is now open and...

    Joseph Lemkin, Esq. Named to ROI-NJ Influencers: Power List 2026 – Law

    Stark & Stark is proud to share that Joseph Lemkin, Esq., Shareholder, has been named to the 2026 Influencers: Power List in the Law category...

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Michael C. Ksiazek, Esq. Secure $1,000,000 Settlement in Medical Malpractice Wrongful Death Case

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Michael C. Ksiazek, Esq. recently secured a $1,000,000 settlement in a medical malpractice wrongful death...

    Joseph Cullen, Esq. and Nicole Durso, Esq. Secure $2,000,000 Settlement in Personal Injury Matter

    Joseph Cullen, Esq. and Nicole Durso, Esq. recently secured a $2,000,000 settlement in a personal injury matter involving a pedestrian who was struck...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes Susan L. Swatski, Esq. to the Firm

    Continuing in its mission to provide its clients innovative legal solutions to meet their needs, Stark & Stark PC, announced today that Susan L....

    Tim Duggan Wins Eminent Domain Challenge – Case Dismissed

    We are pleased to share that Tim Duggan of our Condemnation, Redevelopment, and Eminent Domain Group was successful in protecting the owner of a...

    James Creegan, Esq. Appointed to Board of The 200 Club of Mercer County

    It is our pleasure to announce that James Creegan, Esq. has been appointed to the Board of Directors of The 200 Club of Mercer County, an...