• People

    Advanced Search

  • Services
  • All Services

  • Back to News & Media
    Blog

    Challenging the Transfer of Non-Probate Assets

    March 31, 2021

     Download as PDF

    Suppose a party seeks to challenge a decedent’s last will and testament based upon claims of competency or the improper assertion of undue influence. In that case, this contestant may also seek to challenge the transfer of certain non-probate assets that could comprise either the majority or a substantial percentage of the decedent’s assets. The grounds for challenging such transfers may be identical to those pursued in a challenge to a last will and testament, however, may be subject to applicable statutes and different standards of proof that govern a challenge to a particular class of asset.

    In general, non-probate assets are assets of the decedent which pass outside of the decedent’s last will and testament. These assets might be joint bank accounts, real property, insurance policies, retirement accounts, other financial accounts, or gift transactions that occurred before the decedent’s death. Similar to the claims that can be asserted during a will contest, a party can challenge each one of these transfers based upon allegations of lack of the capacity of the decedent to undertake the transaction or the unlawful assertion of undue influence by the person who received the benefit of the transfer from the decedent. For these reasons, it is common during a will contest that the transfer of certain non-probate assets is challenged as well. Legally, this is required in the interests of judicial economy. It often involves the same set of facts and circumstances relevant in determining whether the decedent’s will is valid.

    In general, a challenge to the transfer of real property or a beneficiary designation with regard to an investment account or insurance policy can be invalidated under essentially the same legal standard involved in challenging a last will and testament. On the other hand, challenging a joint account designation involves a specific statute that requires proof of a certain nature. Moreover, this statute involves legal presumptions which the contestant must rebut. This topic is discussed in a previous blog under the multi-party joint deposit account act. Finally, challenges as to lifetime gifts involve similar facts to a will contest; however, the burden of proof is typically more substantial for the party contesting the transaction. As such, when a party is seeking to challenge the transfer of non-probate assets, they must consider the nature of the transaction and the proof that may be required.

    Key Contact

    Paul W. Norris
    609.895.7325

    Firm Highlights

    Stark & Stark’s Thomas S. Onder, Esq. Receives 2026 ICSC Trustees’ Distinguished Service Award

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Thomas S. Onder, Esq., Shareholder and Chair of the Firm’s Shopping Center & Retail Development...

    Stark & Stark’s Joseph H. Lemkin Esq., Named 2026 Professional Lawyer of the Year for the Jewish Bar Association of New Jersey

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Joseph H. Lemkin Esq. has been selected by the New Jersey Commission on Professionalism in the Law as...

    Our Values Remain: A Message on the Closing of Diversity Lab

    Stark & Stark is saddened and disappointed to learn that Diversity Lab, the organization that created and manages the Mansfield Certification...

    Congratulations to Shareholder Bhaveen R. Jani, Esq. on his Installation as Treasurer of the Middlesex County Bar Foundation

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce that Shareholder Bhaveen R. Jani, Esq. has been installed as Treasurer of the Middlesex County Bar Foundation,...

    Denise Mariani, Esq., and Jonathan Lauri, Esq. Secure $750,000 Jury Verdict Against Hamilton Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

    It is our pleasure to announce that Denise Mariani, Esq., and Jonathan Lauri, Esq., secured a $750,000 jury verdict on behalf of a nursing home...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes 2026 Summer Law Clerks

    Stark & Stark is proud to announce its 10th Annual Summer Law Clerk Program. Five Summer Law Clerks will join the firm from June through July...

    Retail Development Team Secures Major Recovery for Landlord Client Amid Bankruptcy Dispute

    Our Shopping Center and Retail Development Group recently secured a multi-million-dollar settlement for a commercial landlord client' s property...

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Catherine Foley, Esq. Secure $950,000 Settlement in Surgical Malpractice Matter

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Catherine Foley, Esq. recently secured a confidential $950,000 settlement in a surgical malpractice case. “This...

    Victoria Wilton, Esq. Selected to Serve on New Jersey State Bar Association Family Law Executive Committee

    We are proud to announce that Victoria Wilton, Esq. has been selected to serve on the New Jersey State Bar Association Family Law Executive Committee...

    Stark & Stark Joins Growing Coalition of Law Firms in Defense of Constitutional Principles and the Independence of the Legal Profession

    Stark & Stark has joined hundreds of fellow law firms across the country in filing an amicus brief supporting Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, Jenner...

    Stark & Stark Attorneys Recognized as New Jersey “Super Lawyers” and “Rising Stars” in 2026

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that 15 of its attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the list of 2026 New Jersey Super Lawyers,...

    Bruce Stern, Esq. Secures $1,000,000 Settlement in Motor Vehicle Collision Case

    Bruce Stern, Esq. recently secured a $1,000,000 settlement in a motor vehicle collision case.* “This case highlights how quickly things can go...