• People

    Advanced Search

  • Services
  • All Services

  • The Stark & Stark Probate Litigation practice provides counsel to parties who seek to contest the validity of a last will and testament due to undue influence, unequal shares in the decedent’s estate, lack of capacity, or exclusion from an estate. We also proffer defenses on behalf of executors who are forced to defend a will that is being contested. Further, we both prosecute and defend actions where it is alleged that an executor breached his fiduciary duty to the estate.

    Practice Services

    When a party has an issue with a will that has been offered for probate, a will contest may ensue. While contesting a will can be particularly difficult for all parties involved due to the emotional involvement, as well as the complex nature of the litigation, the Stark & Stark Probate Litigation attorneys balance compassion with an aggressive litigation approach.

    When contesting a will, or defending a contested will, time is of the essence. Typically, there is only a four (4) month time period (in-state) and a six (6) month time period (out-of-state) to file a claim to challenge a Will after it has been presented to the surrogate’s office. Some common reasons a will is contested include:

    • Undue Influence – The most common cause of action asserted in will contests is defined as when a person in power psychologically manipulates and persuades the testator to sign a will, usurping the free will and judgment of the testator for their own.
    • Unequal Shares – A common issue for family members is when they have been left unequal shares of an estate. It is not uncommon for the testator to not provide an explanation as to why the estate has been divided unequally. This often forms the impetus for Will contests.
    • Lack of Capacity – When a party feels that the testator lacked the mental capacity to fully understand and agree to the contents of their Last Will and Testament, that party may contest the will. Medical evidence tends to be very important in these types of contests as to the competency of the decedent.
    • Exclusion/Cut out of Will – When a party is omitted from, or “cut out” of a will, they may file a claim challenging the validity of the will based upon undue influence or lack of capacity arguments.
    • Power of Attorney Abuse – A power of attorney provides a secondary party the ability to make major decisions on behalf of the “principal”. When this party makes imprudent or inappropriate decisions and abuses the power given to them, parties may seek to hold this person liable for a breach of that duty of care.
    • Conflict of Interest – Will contests due to perceived conflicts of interest can occur when the attorney documenting the testator’s estate is faced with dueling loyalty to clients. Usually this involves loyalty to the testator as well as a named beneficiary.
    • Noncompliant Executor – These matters involved among situations where the executor has either failed to administer or is improperly administering the estate.

    Probate Litigation Attorneys

    The Stark & Stark Probate Litigation group works closely with outside experts to review medical and accounting records, which allows us to obtain and accurately confirm information about the testator and the estate. Our attorneys represent anyone whose interests under a will or trust are in dispute, or anyone who is concerned about the way in which a vulnerable or incompetent relative’s estate is being managed. We litigate business and partnership issues that need to be resolved in probate court, as well as familial disputes with respect to a testator’s will and handle estates of all sizes, from less than $200,000 to tens of millions of dollars.

    Representative Experience

    *Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances*

    • Successfully challenged the validity of a Will drafted by the sole beneficiary of the Will that was signed the day before the decedent passed away.
    • Successfully challenged the validity of a Will that excluded one of the decedent’s children when the Will was executed while the decedent was hospitalized and was gravely ill.
    • Defended the validity of a Will where the entire estate was left to one of the decedent’s children to the exclusion of the others as this child had provided care to the decedent during the last years of her life.
    • Commenced an action to disqualify an executor who failed to expeditiously administer the estate.
    • Defended against an action whereby an alleged abuse of a power of attorney had occurred.
    • Commenced an action due to an abuse of a power of attorney by a beneficiary under an estate.
    • Defended a Will contest where the plaintiff alleged that Defendant had asserted undue influence over the decedent which caused him to execute the Will in its current format.
    • Successfully challenged a Will where a beneficiary was excluded based upon the claim that the other beneficiary had exerted undue influence over the decedent which caused him to exclude his only other child.

    *Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances*

    Firm Highlights

    Stark & Stark Joins Growing Coalition of Law Firms in Defense of Constitutional Principles and the Independence of the Legal Profession

    Stark & Stark has joined hundreds of fellow law firms across the country in filing an amicus brief supporting Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, Jenner...

    Stark & Stark Attorneys Recognized as New Jersey “Super Lawyers” and “Rising Stars” in 2026

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that 15 of its attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the list of 2026 New Jersey Super Lawyers,...

    Bruce Stern, Esq. Secures $1,000,000 Settlement in Motor Vehicle Collision Case

    Bruce Stern, Esq. recently secured a $1,000,000 settlement in a motor vehicle collision case.* “This case highlights how quickly things can go...

    Deborah Dunn, Esq. Elected to Board of Directors for Angel Flight East

    Stark & Stark is pleased to announce that Deborah Dunn, Esq., Shareholder and Civil Trial Attorney, has been elected to the Board of Directors...

    Michael Jordan, Esq. Joins the Board of the Lawrence Township Community Foundation

    It is our pleasure to announce that Michael Jordan, Esq. has joined the board of the Lawrence Township Community Foundation, an organization...

    Stark & Stark Opens Newtown, Pennsylvania Location

    Stark & Stark announced the relocation of its Yardley, Pennsylvania office to a new location in Newtown, PA. The new office is now open and...

    Joseph Lemkin, Esq. Named to ROI-NJ Influencers: Power List 2026 – Law

    Stark & Stark is proud to share that Joseph Lemkin, Esq., Shareholder, has been named to the 2026 Influencers: Power List in the Law category...

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Michael C. Ksiazek, Esq. Secure $1,000,000 Settlement in Medical Malpractice Wrongful Death Case

    Jeffrey A. Krawitz, Esq. and Michael C. Ksiazek, Esq. recently secured a $1,000,000 settlement in a medical malpractice wrongful death...

    Joseph Cullen, Esq. and Nicole Durso, Esq. Secure $2,000,000 Settlement in Personal Injury Matter

    Joseph Cullen, Esq. and Nicole Durso, Esq. recently secured a $2,000,000 settlement in a personal injury matter involving a pedestrian who was struck...

    Stark & Stark Welcomes Susan L. Swatski, Esq. to the Firm

    Continuing in its mission to provide its clients innovative legal solutions to meet their needs, Stark & Stark PC, announced today that Susan L....

    Tim Duggan Wins Eminent Domain Challenge – Case Dismissed

    We are pleased to share that Tim Duggan of our Condemnation, Redevelopment, and Eminent Domain Group was successful in protecting the owner of a...

    James Creegan, Esq. Appointed to Board of The 200 Club of Mercer County

    It is our pleasure to announce that James Creegan, Esq. has been appointed to the Board of Directors of The 200 Club of Mercer County, an...